2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal mortar-based insulation solutions for historic walls: An extensive hygrothermal characterization of materials and systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodology adopted in the study. *: data from a previous experimental investigation by the authors [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methodology adopted in the study. *: data from a previous experimental investigation by the authors [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The main preparatory steps for the study consist of the choice of three case studies, the measurements performed on-site, and the use of the experimental results for validating numerical simulations. Another fundamental part is the hygrothermal characterization of thermal rendering systems via laboratory testing, which was performed in a previous study by the authors [38]. The data obtained in the aforementioned study are used as input in the numerical simulation tool.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the highly porous Liaver structure enhanced the thermal behavior, and Liaver-containing mortars ended up being the best thermal insulation material of all the examined possibilities. However, the gained thermal conductivity was still high in comparison to the standard thermal insulation materials [ 67 , 68 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, a transient method was adopted, considering the method reported by Antunes et al [33] and Liuzzi et al [20], as reported in Table 2. The transient method offers several benefits [53,54], in particular the smaller dimension of the testing area. This allowed performing the measurement in different parts of the surface of each sample, indicated in Figure 2a.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%