2022
DOI: 10.1002/prs.12399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal modeling for supporting firefighting and emergency response planning

Abstract: This literature review looks at the various types of approaches to industrial storage tank fires and evaluates how quantitative consequence analysis with thermal modeling may aid in the development of industrial site fire preplans and emergency response planning guidelines. Emergency response planners may employ the use of thermal contours on plot plans generated by available consequence modeling software. Such performance‐based approaches can effectively take into account the associated sociotechnical factors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 3.2, the distribution of the injury areas above 180°C has been elaborated for 18 scenarios. Another injury criteria based on the probability of injury or death, and the probabilities of having first‐degree burn, second‐degree burn, and death are calculated based on the TDU (D) using Equations and 3–28,32–34 . Exactly 50% fatality and 100% fatality are calculated and compared with the above injury criteria Pr=normalc1+normalc2lnD Pi=Fk121+erfPr52 where the probit variable Pr is adopted to transform the TDU to the probability of injury or death represented as Pi.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Section 3.2, the distribution of the injury areas above 180°C has been elaborated for 18 scenarios. Another injury criteria based on the probability of injury or death, and the probabilities of having first‐degree burn, second‐degree burn, and death are calculated based on the TDU (D) using Equations and 3–28,32–34 . Exactly 50% fatality and 100% fatality are calculated and compared with the above injury criteria Pr=normalc1+normalc2lnD Pi=Fk121+erfPr52 where the probit variable Pr is adopted to transform the TDU to the probability of injury or death represented as Pi.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another injury criteria based on the probability of injury or death, and the probabilities of having first-degree burn, second-degree burn, and death are calculated based on the TDU (D) using Equations 8 and 9. [32][33][34] Exactly 50% fatality and 100% fatality are calculated and compared with the above injury criteria where the probit variable P r is adopted to transform the TDU to the probability of injury or death represented as P i . F k is correction factor and erf is the error function.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Injury Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%