2022
DOI: 10.3389/fther.2022.961083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal mixing in T-shaped micromixers with a porous block by the lattice Boltzmann method: Influence of the mixing channel configuration

Abstract: The present paper investigates the thermal mixing and cooling processes in a passive micromixer, which is applicable for the cooling of electronic devices. Employing a porous block and testing different configurations for the mixing channel is considered to enhance the mixing process and cooling performance. A 2D lattice Boltzmann thermal model is utilized to investigate the thermal performance of a T-micromixer with a porous block. Two different types of mixing channel configurations, including a step-shaped … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different types of fields are used in an active micromixer, such as magnetic, 4,5 radio frequency, 6 electroosmotic 7,8 and surface acoustic wave. 9–11 Similarly, a passive micromixer device can have different physiological structures, such as Y-type, 12 T-shape, 13 grooves/obstacles, 14 split–recombine, 15 serpentine 16 and herringbone type structures. 17 The construction of an active micromixer has greater complexity than a passive micromixer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of fields are used in an active micromixer, such as magnetic, 4,5 radio frequency, 6 electroosmotic 7,8 and surface acoustic wave. 9–11 Similarly, a passive micromixer device can have different physiological structures, such as Y-type, 12 T-shape, 13 grooves/obstacles, 14 split–recombine, 15 serpentine 16 and herringbone type structures. 17 The construction of an active micromixer has greater complexity than a passive micromixer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%