1999
DOI: 10.1117/12.351133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal management of EUV lithography masks using low-expansion glass substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change in the temperature may be induced, for example, by a difference in temperature of the environment or by the energy absorbed as the mask is scanned during EUV exposure. 5,6 In-plane distortion results from the interaction of the change in the temperature of the mask and the coefficient of thermal expansion of the mask. Again, the coefficient of thermal expansion of the material comprises both the average value plus the spatial variation about the average.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change in the temperature may be induced, for example, by a difference in temperature of the environment or by the energy absorbed as the mask is scanned during EUV exposure. 5,6 In-plane distortion results from the interaction of the change in the temperature of the mask and the coefficient of thermal expansion of the mask. Again, the coefficient of thermal expansion of the material comprises both the average value plus the spatial variation about the average.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value is similar to values used in previous studies. 8 When a gas is used to fill the interstitial space, the average overall backside contact conductance will be considerably higher, depending on the gas heat transfer coefficient. For this study, the values ranged from 4.0 to 154.0 W/m 2 -K.…”
Section: Pressure [Kpa]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Recently however, the research on thermal issues has spread to the reticle side of the manufacturing process. [4][5][6][7][8] One concern is that particles may become lodged between the chuck and reticle, inducing distortions once the reticle is chucked flat. With the advent and proliferation of the electrostatic chuck, backside particle contamination will have to be addressed by the lithographic community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mask absorbs a significant fraction of the incident EUV light, so it should be able to efficiently shed heat to the surrounding vacuum environment. 46 However, the mask will need to be actively cooled in the exposure tool, so maximizing emissivity is probably a low priority for material selection.…”
Section: Absorber and Buffer Layer Choicementioning
confidence: 99%