2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal investigation of a solar box-type cooker with nanocomposite phase change materials using flexible thermography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the traditional method of improving the performance of SBC by adding a reflector(s), the performance of SBC is also improved by modifying the cooking pot [13][14][15][16][17] or adding materials to the inside of the cooker. [18][19][20][21][22][23] The performance of SBC is evaluated by several parameters, including Performance Characteristics, First and Second figures of merit, Time Boiling, Parameter Index, Standard Cooking Power, cooker optothermal ratio (COR), Thermal efficiency, and Exergy efficiency. [24][25][26][27] Mawire et al 28 compared two SBCs with a reflector and without a reflector by evaluating both energy efficiency and exergy efficiency with several water loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the traditional method of improving the performance of SBC by adding a reflector(s), the performance of SBC is also improved by modifying the cooking pot [13][14][15][16][17] or adding materials to the inside of the cooker. [18][19][20][21][22][23] The performance of SBC is evaluated by several parameters, including Performance Characteristics, First and Second figures of merit, Time Boiling, Parameter Index, Standard Cooking Power, cooker optothermal ratio (COR), Thermal efficiency, and Exergy efficiency. [24][25][26][27] Mawire et al 28 compared two SBCs with a reflector and without a reflector by evaluating both energy efficiency and exergy efficiency with several water loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TES systems combined with solar cookers can be advantageous during non-sunshine periods. In recent years, researchers have extensively investigated solar cookers integrated with TES systems [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Saxena and Karakilcik evaluated a solar cooker with low-cost storage material [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the PCM improved the load thermal stabilization during off-sunshine periods. Palanikumar et al [28] investigated a solar box-type cooker with nanocomposite PCMs using flexible thermography. The experiment aimed to compare a solar box cooker with PCM, one with nanoparticles PCM, and one without nanoparticles PCM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palanikumar et al 4 made three solar box cookers using with and without nanocomposite for the phase change materials (NPCM). Analysis of experimental performance for that overall efficiency by the system is used without NPCM, with PCM, and with NPCM, which is obtained as 24.90%–33.90%, 24.77%–45.20%, and 31.77%–56.21%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%