2011
DOI: 10.1680/coma.900041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal insulation performance of aerated lightweight concrete

Abstract: Building envelopes that insulate buildings against heat and cold are receiving increasing attention as a promising passive energy-efficient measure in building construction. The experimental study reported here evaluates the thermal insulation performance of aerated lightweight concrete of different densities produced by incorporating either 100% sand or 100% soil as filler. Experimental aerated lightweight concrete wall panels (750 mm long, 750 mm wide and 40 mm thick) were cast and tested. Both soil-based an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, soil could be considered the more environmentally friendly and sustainable construction material, if the exploitation of sand resources and its excavation and haulage over distances are taken into account. Ng et al (2011) evaluate the thermal insulation performance of aerated lightweight concrete of different densities produced by incorporating either 100% sand or 100% soil as filler. Their results show that the temperature gradient for soil-based aerated lightweight concrete panels was better than that of sand-based aerated lightweight concrete panels of comparable density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, soil could be considered the more environmentally friendly and sustainable construction material, if the exploitation of sand resources and its excavation and haulage over distances are taken into account. Ng et al (2011) evaluate the thermal insulation performance of aerated lightweight concrete of different densities produced by incorporating either 100% sand or 100% soil as filler. Their results show that the temperature gradient for soil-based aerated lightweight concrete panels was better than that of sand-based aerated lightweight concrete panels of comparable density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%