2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.184520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal hysteresis of the Campbell response as a probe for bulk pinning landscape spectroscopy

Abstract: The in-plane distance between atomic defects is much larger than the superconducting coherence length and, for typical magnetic fields (∼ kOe), it is even larger than the inter-vortex distance. The surface-density of atomic defects on a growth surface is generally arXiv:1807.10397v2 [cond-mat.supr-con]

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, an alternative viewpoint describing pinning due to a low density of strong centres was proposed early on, see Refs. [4] and [5]; recently, this strong pinning scenario has attracted increasing attention, particularly in studies of charge density waves [19, 21, and 22] and of magnetic flux-line lattices [23][24][25][26][27]. Although some effort has been made to qualitatively understand the crossover between the two regimes [28 and 29], a quantitative model describing this transition has not been developed so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, an alternative viewpoint describing pinning due to a low density of strong centres was proposed early on, see Refs. [4] and [5]; recently, this strong pinning scenario has attracted increasing attention, particularly in studies of charge density waves [19, 21, and 22] and of magnetic flux-line lattices [23][24][25][26][27]. Although some effort has been made to qualitatively understand the crossover between the two regimes [28 and 29], a quantitative model describing this transition has not been developed so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit of dilute, strong defects has been studied analytically in recent years. Contrary to the qualitative scaling arguments of weak collective pinning theory, the strong pinning framework provides quantitative results for various observables (J c 32,50,52,61,62 , Campbell penetration [63][64][65][66] , zero-and finite-temperature current-voltage characteristics. 34,35,67,68 ) Specifically, the critical current has been shown 52 to follow J c = J dp (n p a 0 ξ 2 )( f p /ε 0 ) 2 , over a wide field range, with J dp being the depairing current, n p the defect density, f p the elementary force provided by a single defect, and ε 0 the vortex line energy.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While conceptually simpler than weak collective pinning, it has taken significantly longer to develop a strong pinning formalism. With its completion in the early 2000s, the formalism enabled computing numerous physical observables, including the critical current 53,54 , the excess-current characteristic [55][56][57][58][59][60] , and the ac Campbell response [11][12][13][14] .…”
Section: A Fundamentals Of Vortex Pinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it has determined the optimal shape, size, and dimensionality of defects necessary to maximize J c , depending on the magnitude and orientation of the magnetic field [7][8][9][10] . Backed by good agreement with experimental and analytic results for simple geometries [11][12][13][14] , the utility of the numerical routine has successfully been extended to previously unknown territories, optimizing pinning geometries outside the scope of analytic methods [2][3][4][7][8][9][10][15][16][17][18] . In fact, these TDGL simulations have unveiled new phenomena-such as a small peak in J c (B) at high fields that is caused by double vortex occupancy of individual pinning sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%