1989
DOI: 10.1115/1.3231405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Hydraulics of Wellbores and Surface Lines During Steam/Hot Water Injection—Part I: Theoretical Model

Abstract: A mathematical model is proposed for analyzing the thermal hydraulic behavior of wellbores and surface lines. The model discusses two-phase pressure drop and heat transfer for a variety of practical wellbore boundary conditions and includes theoretical formulations for calculating effects of geothermal gradient, transient heat flow to the surroundings of the wellbore, and radiation and convection heat transfer in the annulus. The model has been applied to evaluate the effects of insulation thickness, injection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model reported here was originally developed by Jensen and Sharma (1989 A study was performed to determine the optimum control volume size.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model reported here was originally developed by Jensen and Sharma (1989 A study was performed to determine the optimum control volume size.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) heat is transferred radially away from the pipe, (2) fluid and heat flow are steady-state processes, except for heat loss in the wellbores, The correlations used in this modeling effort were obtained from Jensen andSharma (1987, 1989). These include heat transfer coefficients for the outside of surface pipes, film heat transfer coefficients for hot water flowing inside a surface pipe or down a well, and local film heat transfer coefficients for condensing steam flowing inside a surface line or down a well.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the above paper and the earlier study of Lee (1982) the formation temperatures, obtained by the method of Laplace transformation, are rather bulky and require tedious non-trivial numerical evaluations and, therefore, are not very convenient for engineering estimations. Moreover, in these publications and in a number of earlier studies, heat interactions of circulating fluid and with formation were treated under the condition of constant bore-face temperature or heat flux (Edwardson et al 1962;Ramey 1962;Squier et al 1962;Jensen & Sharma 1989;Arnold 1990). On the basis of these solutions, and with some additional simplifying assumptions, several simple analytical formulae for the rock temperature in the formation and the heat flux on the walls of the well were proposed (Kutasov 1987;Kutasov 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%