Thermal fatigue crack nucleation in ferritic–martensitic steels before and after neutron irradiation

Belyaeva, L. A.; Zisman, A. A.; Petersen, C.; Potapova, V. A.; Рыбин, В. В.

doi:10.1016/s0022-3115(00)00368-8

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…F82H is one of the RAF/Ms being rather well characterized [1]. Effect of irradiation on the fatigue properties of RAF/Ms have been reported in several researchers, however the damage levels were limited (below 1 dpa) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The first wall/blanket structure will be irradiated over 1 dpa.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fatigue properties of F82H irradiated at 523 K to 3.8 dpa

Miwa¹,

Jitsukawa²,

Yonekawa³

2004

Journal of Nuclear Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fatigue properties of F82H irradiated at 523 K to 3.8 dpa

Miwa¹,

Jitsukawa²,

Yonekawa³

2004

Journal of Nuclear Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For single-phase materials, grain boundaries may play an important role in crack development [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Similar relationships between cracking and microstructure can occur in fatigue wear [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. However, often when conducting observations or calculations to predict the morphology of thermal fatigue wear crack mesh, for simplicity’s sake, a complex factor related to the morphology of precipitates, such as carbides, is not taken into account [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Tool Wear Issues in Hot Forging of Steel

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Steel forging tools are subjected to a number of tribological wear mechanisms depending on the geometry and surface of the tool and the flow of the material. Thus, there is no single general tribological wear mechanism, and only the predominant wear mechanisms in this case can be indicated. The problem has been known for years, but due to its complexity research on it is still relevant. In this study, the various wear mechanisms of hot work tools are analyzed on the basis of original research. Moreover, the influence of the micro- and macrostructure of the material and of its mechanical, physical, and technological characteristics on susceptibility to a given type of wear is considered. Adhesive wear, wear caused by plastic deformation, mechanical fatigue, thermal fatigue, the influence of hardness, heat treatment, and impact strength on tool wear and the mechanisms causing this wear are discussed in addition to tribological wear mechanisms such as abrasive wear. The influence of thermomechanical history and the characteristics of the tool material, including structural anisotropy, on the wear of these tools is indicated. The analysis of wear mechanisms performed will enable more precise definition of the principles of tool material selection and tool material condition for the hot forging of steel.

show abstract

Thermo-mechanical fatigue behavior of reduced activation ferrite/martensite stainless steels

Petersen

Rodrian

2008

International Journal of Fatigue

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thermal fatigue crack nucleation in ferritic–martensitic steels before and after neutron irradiation

Cited by 5 publications

References 2 publications

Fatigue properties of F82H irradiated at 523 K to 3.8 dpa

Fatigue properties of F82H irradiated at 523 K to 3.8 dpa

Tool Wear Issues in Hot Forging of Steel

Thermo-mechanical fatigue behavior of reduced activation ferrite/martensite stainless steels

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About