10th Annual International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.1990.688853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Emissivity And Infrared Temperature Dependence On Plant Canopy Architecture And View Angle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Averaged measurements of leaf temperature provide a close empirical measurement of directional vegetation kinetic temperature (hereafter referred to as canopy temperature), and also approximate the radiative temperature for the canopy that we expect at low zenith angles given that the leaves are large, the canopy is closed, and emissivity of leaves is known to be high (Norman, Chen, & Goel, 1990). Unfortunately, a mismatch of 1 to 1.5 h between the in situ LiCor measurements and the closest flight line prevented us from using these raw leaf temperature measurements as validation data.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Averaged measurements of leaf temperature provide a close empirical measurement of directional vegetation kinetic temperature (hereafter referred to as canopy temperature), and also approximate the radiative temperature for the canopy that we expect at low zenith angles given that the leaves are large, the canopy is closed, and emissivity of leaves is known to be high (Norman, Chen, & Goel, 1990). Unfortunately, a mismatch of 1 to 1.5 h between the in situ LiCor measurements and the closest flight line prevented us from using these raw leaf temperature measurements as validation data.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal infrared (TIR) remote sensing is the only possible approach to retrieve LST (Coll et al, 2005) spatial resolutions and periodicities. Several factors need to be quantified in order to retrieve LST from satellite TIR data, such as, sensor radiometric calibrations (Wukelic et al, 1989), atmospheric correction (Cooper and Asrar, 1989), surface emissivity correction (Norman et al, 1990), characterization of spatial variability over land cover, and the combined effects of viewing geometry, background, and fractional vegetative cover. In estimation of LST from TIR data, the digital number of the image pixel needs to be converted into spectral radiance using the sensor calibration data (Markham and Barker, 1986) and emissivity correction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also some preliminary indications from measurements made at the FIFE site of the changes of remotely-sensed temperatures with time and viewing angle (see Hall et al, 1992, Figure 10a, data from Vining and Blad, 1992), that the use of temporal changes may also reduce problems associated with angle of view. Some additional supporting results from the FIFE using the Cupid model (Norman et al, 1990) are shown in Figure 3(a,b). A comparison between measured and modeled directional brightness temperatures is shown in Figure 3(a) to support the validity of the model and show the importance of directional effects.…”
Section: Sensible Energy Flux Density (W/m"2)mentioning
confidence: 83%