2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal effects in blasting and erosion of polymeric materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, they appear to be consistent with mechanical properties above melting temperature. This observation suggests that thermal effects may arise locally during the impact generated by the collapse of a cavitation bubble or the dissipation of the impact energy into heat [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, they appear to be consistent with mechanical properties above melting temperature. This observation suggests that thermal effects may arise locally during the impact generated by the collapse of a cavitation bubble or the dissipation of the impact energy into heat [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies on the erosion by solid particles also suggest the local increase of the temperature and the dissipation of the impact energy into heat. This was observed in the case of polymers but not in the case of metals [11,12]. Moreover, it is worthy to notice that it is extremely difficult to determine the local and instantaneous temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…4.3) between the abrasive nozzle tip and the target was held constant at 20 mm, perpendicular to the target in all cases. The chosen pressure and standoff distance are consistent with typical AJM conditions used by a number of investigators [26,[82][83][84][85], and have been optimized for a number of factors. For example, measurements have shown that use of a shorter standoff distance results in a lower particle velocity, since the particles are still accelerating up to 20 mm from the nozzle [86].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shipway and Hutchings [28] found motivation for their study based on the fact that erosion rates have appeared different under seemingly similar gas blast erosion tests. The authors found that the gas plume was unaffected by the nozzle internal roughness whereas the particle plumes were.…”
Section: Jet Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%