2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-016-0534-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal effect on dynamics of thin and thick composite laminated microbeams by modified couple stress theory for different boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modified couple stress theory has been used for the static and dynamic analysis of beams and plates. The subjects of some of the studies that have employed the modified coupled stress theory are as follows: Vibration and static bending behaviors of a Timoshenko beam [35]; bending and buckling of a microtubule [22]; free vibration of an embedded magneto-electro-elastic nanoshell [23]; free vibration of a cracked microbeam [53]; static and dynamic analysis of a third-order FG microbeam [49]; free vibration analysis of composite laminated microbeams using a variational formulation [25] and finally, the effects of surface elasticity on the free vibration of a rotating Timoshenko nanobeam [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified couple stress theory has been used for the static and dynamic analysis of beams and plates. The subjects of some of the studies that have employed the modified coupled stress theory are as follows: Vibration and static bending behaviors of a Timoshenko beam [35]; bending and buckling of a microtubule [22]; free vibration of an embedded magneto-electro-elastic nanoshell [23]; free vibration of a cracked microbeam [53]; static and dynamic analysis of a third-order FG microbeam [49]; free vibration analysis of composite laminated microbeams using a variational formulation [25] and finally, the effects of surface elasticity on the free vibration of a rotating Timoshenko nanobeam [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free vibration response of SS LC microbeams was predicted by Mohammad-Abadi and Daneshmehr (2015) employing the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory (EBT), TBT, and Reddy beam theory (RBT) and using the generalized differential quadrature method (GDQM). Ghadiri et al (2016) used the MCST to predict the vibration behavior of LC microbeams under thermal effects by employing various beam theories based on the Fourier series expansion and GDQM. In a very recent study by Nguyen et al (2018aNguyen et al ( , 2018b, the Ritz method was employed for the bending, vibration, and buckling analysis of LC microbeams subjected to various boundary conditions (BCs) based on a higher-order beam theory (HOBT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%