2008
DOI: 10.1380/jsssj.29.537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Decomposition Process of Ultrathin Oxide Layers on Si(100)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 3 ) and a lower bound one of 3.3 eV (Engstrom et al . 2 ), the latter one being close to what is found for Si(001) 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 . Desorption energies were not calculated for the Si(111) surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 3 ) and a lower bound one of 3.3 eV (Engstrom et al . 2 ), the latter one being close to what is found for Si(001) 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 . Desorption energies were not calculated for the Si(111) surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Finally, our fitting procedure leading to the extraction of the three kinetic parameters differs from the Avrami analysis by Kinefuchi and coworkers 7 who chose deliberately an activation energy equal to that of SiO g desorption at nearly zero oxygen coverage 6 . This a priori choice may lead to a non-integer n exponent between 2 (instantaneous nucleation) and 3 (constant nucleation rate), of unphysical meaning (see “Methods” subsection “Fitting of the desorption curves with a non-isothermal Avrami kinetic model”), unless one concedes it reflects a nucleation rate that decays exponentially with time 64 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%