1994
DOI: 10.1021/j100052a035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal decomposition of phosgene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
55
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
10
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the high-pressure limit for the combination reaction are in essential agreement with Parker et al [15]. These numbers are about a factor of 2 higher than those calculated from Lennard-Jones collisions modified by electronic degeneracy, as proposed by Lim and Michael [12]. Since the data are close to the lowpressure limit and not very sensitive to k ∞ , use of these lower values for the high-pressure limit, while keeping all other parameters constant, lowers the calculated values at 300 K by about 15% at the highest experimental pressure (see Fig.…”
Section: Ch 3 + CL → Ch 3 Cl In Hesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of the high-pressure limit for the combination reaction are in essential agreement with Parker et al [15]. These numbers are about a factor of 2 higher than those calculated from Lennard-Jones collisions modified by electronic degeneracy, as proposed by Lim and Michael [12]. Since the data are close to the lowpressure limit and not very sensitive to k ∞ , use of these lower values for the high-pressure limit, while keeping all other parameters constant, lowers the calculated values at 300 K by about 15% at the highest experimental pressure (see Fig.…”
Section: Ch 3 + CL → Ch 3 Cl In Hesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Lim and Michael [12] studied the reaction at three different loading pressures of Ar corresponding to pressures of approximately 300, 450, and 600 Torr. They concluded that the difference in rate constants was small enough that the entire data set could be represented by the first-order rate constant, k 1 (s −1 ) = 1.21 × 10 10 exp(−27838/T ).…”
Section: Ch 3 CL → Ch 3 + Cl In Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ls], CH3Cl [10,11], C3H3Cl [19], CFC13 [16,20], CF2C12 [16,21], CF3Cl [16,22], CF2HCl [13], CF3I [12], CH3I [23], C2H5I [24], C6H5I [25], and CC120 [26]. The methods used are nearly identical in all cases, and for the purposes of discussion, we will illustrate the method with CH3I data -ln(IdIo) (It and Io refer to transmitted and incident I-atom resonance light intensities, respectively), is measured as CH3I decomposes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Br-atom resonance lamp configuration (2.2 torr flow of 0.1% Br 2 in UHP He, at 50 W microwave power) is similar to the Cl-atom lamp detailed elsewhere [17,18]. The Br lamp was derived from that used in flash photolysis-resonance fluorescence work [19].…”
Section: Br-atom Aras Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the path length is 9.94 cm, the Br atom absorption cross-section is . Hence, Br atom analysis Ϫ14 2 ϭ 1.419 ϫ 10 cm is more sensitive than that for Cl atoms [17,18] and is less sensitive than that for I-atoms [3]. At higher concentrations the curve becomes increasingly nonlinear due no doubt to resonance lamp self-reversal.…”
Section: ϫ3mentioning
confidence: 99%