2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal creep modeling of HT9 steel for fast reactor applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this model, however, there is no tertiary creep rate expression, only a primary and secondary creep rate component are considered, as shown in Eq. (2.11) [10].…”
Section: Ryu Kim and Yacout Thermal Creep Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this model, however, there is no tertiary creep rate expression, only a primary and secondary creep rate component are considered, as shown in Eq. (2.11) [10].…”
Section: Ryu Kim and Yacout Thermal Creep Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ε𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 is the total creep strain rate over a time domain (nominally a timestep of the fuel performance code), ε𝑡ℎ.𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 is the sum of all contributions to the thermal creep strain rate, and ε𝑖𝑟𝑟.𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 is the sum of contributions to the irradiation creep strain rate. To calculate the thermal creep strain rate, two empirical models currently exist for HT-9 cladding in BISON: one from the Metallic Fuels Handbook (MFH) [9] and the other developed by Ryu et al (RKY) [10]. Although they present different functional forms, the underlying mechanics of their implementation into BISON is similar.…”
Section: Metallic Fuels Handbook and Ryu Kim And Yacout Creep Correla...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure23also shows the stress exponent values obtained by load-to-failure creep tests for HT-9 F/M steel[9] and three austenitic stainless steels[10,11]. The calculated stress exponent values for OFRAC and those obtained for HT-9 and the stainless steels are shown in the legends of Figure23and are plotted as a function of test temperature in Figure 24.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%