1989
DOI: 10.1016/0012-821x(89)90038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal consequences of mantled gneiss dome emplacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intrusive, metamorphic and deformation relationships between the Dassu Gneiss and surrounding rocks are not necessarily the result of dome-stage magma intrusion, as has been suggested (Hanson, 1986;Bertrand et al, 1988). Recent thermal models of mantled gneiss dome structures suggest a possible alternative interpretation (Allen & Chamberlain, 1989). These models have shown that isotherms are domed over such structures, due to a contrast in the thermal conductivities of the dome core and mantle rocks.…”
Section: Metamorphism and Tectonics North Of The Mktmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intrusive, metamorphic and deformation relationships between the Dassu Gneiss and surrounding rocks are not necessarily the result of dome-stage magma intrusion, as has been suggested (Hanson, 1986;Bertrand et al, 1988). Recent thermal models of mantled gneiss dome structures suggest a possible alternative interpretation (Allen & Chamberlain, 1989). These models have shown that isotherms are domed over such structures, due to a contrast in the thermal conductivities of the dome core and mantle rocks.…”
Section: Metamorphism and Tectonics North Of The Mktmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These models have shown that isotherms are domed over such structures, due to a contrast in the thermal conductivities of the dome core and mantle rocks. Solid-state emplacement of the dome core rocks by ductile diapiric ascent, due to buoyancy contrast (Fletcher, 1972), advects heat which is further diffusively focused by the conductivity contrast during conductive thermal relaxation (Allen & Chamberlain, 1989). The thermal models predict doming of isograds and possible heating of adjacent gneiss dome structures, such as the Dassu Gneiss, without need for an intrusive heat source (Allen & Chamberlain, 1989).…”
Section: Metamorphism and Tectonics North Of The Mktmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) Heat refraction due to lateral variations in the thermal conductivity of rocks, such as might be consequent on the emplacement of mantled gneiss domes or folding of basement-cover unconformities (e.g. Jaupart & Provost 1985;Allen & Chamberlain 1989;Mildren & Sandiford 1995). (7) Transition from low-T-high-P to high-Tlow-P conditions coincident with the cessation of subduction (e.g.…”
Section: Possible Causes Of High-t-low-p Metamorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinctive tectono‐stratigraphic characteristic of many granite‐greenstone terrains is a thick, dense supracrustal greenstone assemblage (dominated by mafic‐ultramafic volcanic rocks) overlying a less dense and more evolved granitoid midcrust. Granitoid‐dominated “domes” are usually exposed in the cores of antiformal culminations 30–120 km in diameter, and are separated by comparatively narrow, synclinal greenstone “keels” [e.g., Eskola , 1948; MacGregor , 1951; Anhaeusser et al , 1969; Hickman , 1983, 1984; Allen and Chamberlain , 1989; Marshak et al , 1992, 1997; Choukroune et al , 1995; Collins et al , 1998; Van Kranendonk et al , 2002, 2004]. However, the fragmentary record of the Archean means that our understanding of the primary tectonic mechanisms responsible for early crustal growth and differentiation is incomplete [ Choukroune et al , 1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%