2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10765-011-0975-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Conductivity of Standard Sands II. Saturated Conditions

Abstract: A non-stationary thermal probe technique was used to measure the thermal conductivity of three saturated standard sands (Ottawa sand C-109, Ottawa sand C-190, and Toyoura sand) in a range of soil porosities (n) from 0.32 to 0.42, and temperatures (T ) from 25 • C to 70 • C. The sand thermal conductivities at full saturation (λ sat ) increased with decreasing n (increasing compaction, 1 − n). In addition, a declining λ sat (T ) n=const trend was observed. The peak λ sat values and highest decreasing rate of λ s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In saturated conditions, the guarded hot plate apparatus measured a maximum discrepancy of 5.2% lower than the reference data by Reference [78] at 25 • C. The variations do not seem significant, falling within the expected uncertainties of the methods. However, when in Reference [34] guarded hot plate and thermal needle probe measurements were compared for a range of temperatures from 25 • C to 70 • C, the steady-state method provided higher thermal conductivities than the ones reported by References [33,71]: 2.7%, 10%, and 17.5% at 25 • C, 50 • C, and 70 • C, respectively. This misfit is attributed to the water movement driven by a temperature gradient, i.e., buoyancy-driven water flow.…”
Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In saturated conditions, the guarded hot plate apparatus measured a maximum discrepancy of 5.2% lower than the reference data by Reference [78] at 25 • C. The variations do not seem significant, falling within the expected uncertainties of the methods. However, when in Reference [34] guarded hot plate and thermal needle probe measurements were compared for a range of temperatures from 25 • C to 70 • C, the steady-state method provided higher thermal conductivities than the ones reported by References [33,71]: 2.7%, 10%, and 17.5% at 25 • C, 50 • C, and 70 • C, respectively. This misfit is attributed to the water movement driven by a temperature gradient, i.e., buoyancy-driven water flow.…”
Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, there is a trend to utilise steadystate methods for rocks (solid mineral matter) and transient methods for soils (e.g., see Reference [40]). [20,33,34,47,66,[70][71][72][73][74]; Sr: degree of saturation, n: porosity.…”
Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another important feature of the simulating ground is its interchangeability, which is why saturated sand is chosen as simulating ground. The thermal properties assumed for the simulated and simulating ground are as follow: = 3.5 W•m -1 •K -1 , = 1.58•10 -6 m 2 ·s -1 and = 3.0 W•m -1 •K -1 , = 7.00•10 -7 m 2 ·s -1 , respectively (Arkhangelskaya & Lukyashchenko, 2017;Sundberg, 1991;Tarnawski et al, 2011). The thermal properties of the simulating ground should be well characterized before experiments are to be performed.…”
Section: Scaling Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper preparation of saturated soil samples is essential for obtaining reliable λ sat data [18]. First, a mass of dry soil, equivalent to the assumed dry bulk density, was added to a known volume of a cylindrical container.…”
Section: Measurement Of λ Satmentioning
confidence: 99%