2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2140/aa5831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductivity of major rock types in western and central Anatolia regions, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge of thermal transport properties of rocks has been a subject of great interest for scientists and engineers for estimation of exact heat transfer in rocks during the drilling process at oil and gas extraction plants. Accurate values of thermal properties of rocks are needed for geothermal modeling and underground energy storage [1][2][3][4]. Rocks are considered as poor heat conducting solids and their thermal conductivities are based mainly on phononic (lattice conductivity) contribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of thermal transport properties of rocks has been a subject of great interest for scientists and engineers for estimation of exact heat transfer in rocks during the drilling process at oil and gas extraction plants. Accurate values of thermal properties of rocks are needed for geothermal modeling and underground energy storage [1][2][3][4]. Rocks are considered as poor heat conducting solids and their thermal conductivities are based mainly on phononic (lattice conductivity) contribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the model overpressure to downward fluid flow into basement rock, was modelled using ranges in pre‐Messinian claystone permeabilities of 10 –17 –10 –22 m 2 at porosities of 2%–14% for a 4,000 m subsurface depth. To ground truth mineral dehydration as an overpressure mechanism in the region, heat flow of 80–120 m W/m 2 (Carballo et al, 2014), thermal conductivities for marlstone of 1.5–3.0 W/m K/m (Erickson & Von Herzen, 1978), thermal conductivities for gypsum of 1.0–1.3 W/m K/m (Balkan et al, 2017; Robertson & Geological Survey (U.S.), 1988), thick basin‐ward units and seabed temperature are used to estimate the thermal structure of the 1D sediment column. Combining these temperature data with pressure data we estimate the P‐T conditions of the Algero‐Balearic Upper Unit Gypsum relative to the boundaries of the dehydration reaction.…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available thermal conductivity measurements of surface outcrops were made on wet conditions. If thermal conductivity measurements were not available, literature values from Erkan (2015) and Balkan et al (2017) were used. Menderes graben.…”
Section: Heat Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%