Thermal conductivity of landfast Antarctic and Arctic sea ice

Abstract

[1] We present final results from a program to measure the thermal conductivity of sea ice with in situ thermistor arrays using an amended analysis of new and previously reported ice temperatures. Results from landfast first-year (FY) ice near Barrow, Alaska, and McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, are consistent with predictions from effective-medium models but 10-15% higher than values from the parameterization currently used in most sea ice models. We observe no previously reported anomalous near-surface reduction, which is now understood to have been an artifact, nor a convective enhancement to the heat flow, although our analysis is limited to temperatures below À5°C at which brine percolation is restricted. Results for landfast multiyear (MY) ice in McMurdo Sound are also consistent with effective-medium predictions, and emphasize the density dependence. We compare these and historical measurements with effective-medium predictions and the representation commonly used in sea ice models, developed originally for MY Arctic ice. We propose an alternative expression derived from effective-medium models, appropriate for both MY and FY ice that is consistent with experimental results, k = (r/r i )(2.11 À 0.011 q + 0.09 (S/q) À (r À r i )/1000), where r i and r are the density of pure ice and sea ice (kg m À3 ), and q (°C) and S (ppt) are sea ice temperature and salinity. For the winter and spring conditions studied here, thermal signatures of internal brine motion were observed rarely (22 times in 1957 days), and their maximum contribution to the total heat flow is estimated to be of the order of a few percent.

The Louvain-La-Neuve sea ice model LIM3.6: global and regional capabilities

“…where z is the vertical (layer) coordinate, ρ the snow/ice density (assumed constant), E the snow/ice internal energy per unit mass (Schmidt et al, 2004), S the salinity, k the thermal conductivity (Pringle et al, 2007) and R the internal solar heating rate. The effect of brine inclusions is represented through the S and T dependency of E and k (e.g.…”

New insight from CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness for sea ice modelling

“…1b. The reduction of snow leads to an increase of May ice thickness of 0.12 m and to a decrease of September ice thickness of 0.06 m. Applying an increased conductivity coefficient for colder temperature (Pringle et al, 2007, CICE-mw-form-e-sd-bubbly) in addition reduces the error for CICE-free and CICE-ini to 20 less than 0.1 m. This modification increases winter ice growth, but it has no impact during summer.…”

“…We apply the bubbly conductivity formulation from Pringle et al (2007) Table 2. Sensitivity simulations exploring the impact of uncertainty in atmospheric forcing data.…”

Advances in understanding and parameterization of small-scale physical processes in the marine Arctic climate system: a review

“…The thermal conductivity of snow is usually parameterized as a function of snow density, and that of sea ice, as a function of ice temperature and salinity (Maykut and Untersteiner, 1971). Pringle et al (2007) presented a new parameterization for sea ice on the basis of amended data analysis; heat conductivity was higher than that based on Maykut and Untersteiner (1971): by 5-10 % for multiyear ice and by 5-15 % for first-year ice. For snow, a micro-tomographic study by Calonne et al (2011) indicated that effective thermal conductivity increases with decreasing temperature, mostly following the temperature dependency of the thermal conductivity of ice.…”