1996
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4526(95)00858-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductivity of GaAs/AlAs superlattices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, quantitative analysis of the relative importance of these different mechanisms has not been completed yet and it is not clear which mechanism contributes most to the reduction of the thermal conductivity under different conditions. Experimental results [6,7] indicate that as the period of the superlattice decreases, the thermal conductivity along the cross-plane direction also decreases, and for very short period superlattice, its thermal conductivity could even fall below the alloy limit, i.e. if the two materials mixed homogeneously into an alloy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, quantitative analysis of the relative importance of these different mechanisms has not been completed yet and it is not clear which mechanism contributes most to the reduction of the thermal conductivity under different conditions. Experimental results [6,7] indicate that as the period of the superlattice decreases, the thermal conductivity along the cross-plane direction also decreases, and for very short period superlattice, its thermal conductivity could even fall below the alloy limit, i.e. if the two materials mixed homogeneously into an alloy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superlattice structures provide the possibility of decreasing materials' thermal conductivity while retaining their electrical conductivity, thus achieving a high thermoelectric figure-of-merit and improving the performance of thermoelectric devices. A large amount of experimental and theoretical work [3][4][5][6][7][8] has been carried out to study the effects of lattice period and interface on the thermal conductivity of various kinds of superlattice films. Results showed that the superlattice may have a much lower thermal conductivity than the value for each of the two materials composing the superlattice structure along both the in -plane and the cross-plane directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal-conductivity tensor of a SL system reduces to two values: the in-plane thermal conductivity κ (inplane heat flow is assumed isotropic) and the crossplane thermal conductivity κ ⊥ . Experimental results have shown that, in SLs, the thermal conductivity is very anisotropic [65] (κ κ ⊥ ) while both κ and κ ⊥ are smaller than the weighted average of the constituent bulk materials [66][67][68][69][70]. Both effects can be attributed to the interfaces between adjacent layers [71,72].…”
Section: Active Core: a Iii-v Superlatticementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Apart from calculating the ITBR, an effective interface scattering rate τ −1 interface ( q) dependent on the same specularity parameter p spec ( q) is added to the internal scattering rate to calculate modified κ (see detailed derivations in [48]). By adjusting only ∆, typically between 1-2Å, the calculated thermal conductivity using this model fits a number of different experiments [66,68,69].…”
Section: Twofold Influence Of Effective Interface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on boundary roughness, phonon may exhibit the mirror (specular) reflection or the diffuse reflection, when it is scattered in all directions [22]. That is why in multi-layered structures, thermal conductivity in the direction perpendicular to layer boundaries is considerably reduced compared to the weighted average of bulk values of constituent layers [23][24][25]. Besides, a distinct anisotropy in the thermal conductivity is observed.…”
Section: Thermal Vcsel Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%