2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10765-015-1840-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal-Conductivity Measurements of Aviation Kerosene RP-3 from (285 to 513) K at Sub- and Supercritical Pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The component and mole fraction of the surrogate are listed in Table 3. Figure 3 shows the comparison of numerical data and experimental data [25][26][27][28] for the thermo-physical properties of aviation kerosene at P = 3 MPa. Good agreement has been reached between the calculated results and experimental data at P = 3 MPa.…”
Section: Thermo-physical Properties Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The component and mole fraction of the surrogate are listed in Table 3. Figure 3 shows the comparison of numerical data and experimental data [25][26][27][28] for the thermo-physical properties of aviation kerosene at P = 3 MPa. Good agreement has been reached between the calculated results and experimental data at P = 3 MPa.…”
Section: Thermo-physical Properties Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middle zone, where the tube wall temperature is higher than the supercritical temperature. As the near wall fluid has very low density and low viscosity, comparison of numerical data and experimental data [23][24][25][26] for the thermo-physical properties of aviation kerosene at P = 3 Mpa can be found in our previous publication [27]. Good agreement has been reached between the calculated results and experimental data.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The 30 bar thermal conductivities reported by Xu et al [72], which are measured using a double transient hot-wire method, are on average 9% different compared to data reported by Jia et al [73] at the single pressure of 30 bar, which are measured using a steady and kinetic method, an experimental technique proposed in the article [73]. We note that all three studies [72,73,77] are from the same research group. d The number averaged MW and the HN/CN ratio of the samples are reported by Won et al [78] and Chickos and Zhao [79].…”
Section: Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…c The number averaged MW and the HN/CN ratio of the sample are calculated from the detailed composition of the RP3 fuel reported by Deng et al [77]. The 30 bar thermal conductivities reported by Xu et al [72], which are measured using a double transient hot-wire method, are on average 9% different compared to data reported by Jia et al [73] at the single pressure of 30 bar, which are measured using a steady and kinetic method, an experimental technique proposed in the article [73]. We note that all three studies [72,73,77] are from the same research group.…”
Section: Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation