2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductivity measurements for small molecule organic solid materials using modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC) and data corrections for sample porosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the authors compared the results obtained by MDSC with those from X-ray diffraction and concluded that XRD exhibited poor detection of low amorphous content (<10%), while with MDSC it was identified at a lower percent (>1) due to the sensitivity for Tg determination. Lin et al [88] reported a method for measuring the thermal conductivity of small-molecule organic solid materials using MDSC. The experimental section involved the compaction of 18 pure small molecule compounds such as acetaminophen, aspirin, carbamazepine III, Υ-indomethacin, and ketoprofen, among others.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the authors compared the results obtained by MDSC with those from X-ray diffraction and concluded that XRD exhibited poor detection of low amorphous content (<10%), while with MDSC it was identified at a lower percent (>1) due to the sensitivity for Tg determination. Lin et al [88] reported a method for measuring the thermal conductivity of small-molecule organic solid materials using MDSC. The experimental section involved the compaction of 18 pure small molecule compounds such as acetaminophen, aspirin, carbamazepine III, Υ-indomethacin, and ketoprofen, among others.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass density was determined from the measured volumetric heat capacity. The specific heat capacity (c p ) for the IMC films was taken as 1165 J kg −1 K −1 , a value determined for crystalγ-IMC at 300 K. [46] Although it was possible that there were spatially varying crystalline or amorphous regions on the sample (Figure 1c) we assumed that the specific heat capacity of the IMC films did not change. [47][48][49] Thus, any differences in the measured volumetric heat capacity were attributed to variations in mass density.…”
Section: Thermal Characterization and Mass Density Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal conductivities of glass knormalg, stainless mesh knormalm, and solution knormall are 1.05, 16, and 0.137 W/m K, respectively. Because thermal conductivities of small‐molecule organic solid materials are in the range of 0.1273–0.3472 W/m K, and the crystal is immersed in the solvent, the thermal conductivity of the Aliskiren hemifumarate solid crystal layer is estimated as the same as the ethyl acetate–ethanol mixture, 0.137 W/m K. As the volumetric flow rate of the cooling liquid at 24 L/min is very high relative to the solution flow rate, T1i and T2o can be assumed equal to Tc1 and Tc2, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental System and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%