1977
DOI: 10.1063/1.323697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, and Seebeck coefficient of high-purity chromium from 280 to 1000 K

Abstract: The thermal conductivity λ, electrical resistivity ρ, and Seebeck coefficient S of a high-purity Cr specimen (ρ273/ρ4.2=380) were measured from 285 to 1000 K. The ρ and S of two other Cr specimens (ρ273/ρ4.2=380 and 58) were determined from 300 to 1300 K. The ρ and S results from the three specimens are in excellent agreement and all three properties agree to within experimental uncertainty with previous low-temperature results on the same specimens over the temperature range of overlap. Near T′N (300–320 K), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison with Seebeck coefficient data 16,43,48 for LaFeAsO and Cr shows that the observed characteristics, namely a fluctuation regime at T > T N and a sharp change of S at T N , are apparently generic features at SDW transitions. Interestingly, the contributions in the fluctuation regime and at T T N have the same sign in both LaFeAsO and Cr, whereas their sign is opposite in Mn 3 Si.…”
Section: E Seebeck Effectmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison with Seebeck coefficient data 16,43,48 for LaFeAsO and Cr shows that the observed characteristics, namely a fluctuation regime at T > T N and a sharp change of S at T N , are apparently generic features at SDW transitions. Interestingly, the contributions in the fluctuation regime and at T T N have the same sign in both LaFeAsO and Cr, whereas their sign is opposite in Mn 3 Si.…”
Section: E Seebeck Effectmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…18,22 Surprisingly the temperature behavior of the resistivity of Cr is very different because it exhibits a small hump below T N . 43,44 C. Hall effect…”
Section: B Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, such calibration was not carried out and we relied on the reported sensitivity 1 . Calibration of thermocouple for determination of the absolute temperature are important when films of several nanometers are used due to strong differences in Seebeck coefficient (thermopower): it changes from −4 to +14 μ V/K when the film of Cr is increasing in thickness from 5 to 10 nm 16 (the scale is defined with Platinum having the Seebeck coefficient S = 0, S = −15 (Ni), S = +6.5 μ V/K (Au)). The bulk Cr has thermopower S = 21.8 μ V/K 16 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected resistances of patterned EGaIn are calculated from a parallel circuit formed by the underneath adhesive Au layer and EGaIn structure. Here, because the thickness of Cr (4 nm) is ten times thinner than Au (60 nm) and Cr is six times more resistive than Au (0.12 Ω·μm for Cr 46 and 0.02 Ω·μm for Au 47 ), the contribution of Cr to the electrical conductance is neglected. The resistivity of the adhesive Au layer is characterized by measuring the resistance of the sample before patterning EGaIn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%