1970
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/3/11/319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conduction energy loss in an argon afterglow

Abstract: The decay of neutral gas temperature in low pressure argon afterglows has been measured by monitoring the acoustic standing waves excited by the ionizing discharge, with a microwave interferometer. Calculations, based on heat loss by atom thermal conduction only, give very good agreement with experimental results over a wide range of plasma conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The double layer evolved from an anode sheath, as has been observed in similar devices in a homogeneous magnetic field (Torven and Anderson 1979, Torven and Lindberg 1980, Anderson 1981, Fujita et a1 1984. It has not been possible to interpret the transition from an anode sheath to a double layer as a sequence of steady states (Anderson and Sorensen 1983), but fluctuations are important as has been shown by numerical simulations (Cooke and Katz 1985). Ionisation within the anode sheath is the dominant process in the transition, in spite of the fact that the typical ionisation mean free path for an electron is several metres and the anode sheath thickness less than 1 cm (Torven and Anderson 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double layer evolved from an anode sheath, as has been observed in similar devices in a homogeneous magnetic field (Torven and Anderson 1979, Torven and Lindberg 1980, Anderson 1981, Fujita et a1 1984. It has not been possible to interpret the transition from an anode sheath to a double layer as a sequence of steady states (Anderson and Sorensen 1983), but fluctuations are important as has been shown by numerical simulations (Cooke and Katz 1985). Ionisation within the anode sheath is the dominant process in the transition, in spite of the fact that the typical ionisation mean free path for an electron is several metres and the anode sheath thickness less than 1 cm (Torven and Anderson 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%