1967
DOI: 10.1016/0010-406x(67)90802-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductance in birds and mammals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
101
1
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
10
101
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the thermoneutral zone, metabolic heat production exactly balances the heat dissipated, which is chiefly a function of surface area. However, as the cross-surface temperature differential increases, the metabolic scaling slope should approach~0.45-0.55, as typically observed for the scaling of thermal conductance in birds and mammals [6,[79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86]. As predicted, when T a equals 0 • C (which is greater than 30 • C below T b ), the metabolic scaling exponents for mammals (0.40), passerine birds (0.52) and nonpasserine birds (0.53) ( [56,58]; Figures 3 and 4) all approach that observed for the scaling exponent of thermal conductance.…”
Section: Implications Of Results For Theorymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Within the thermoneutral zone, metabolic heat production exactly balances the heat dissipated, which is chiefly a function of surface area. However, as the cross-surface temperature differential increases, the metabolic scaling slope should approach~0.45-0.55, as typically observed for the scaling of thermal conductance in birds and mammals [6,[79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86]. As predicted, when T a equals 0 • C (which is greater than 30 • C below T b ), the metabolic scaling exponents for mammals (0.40), passerine birds (0.52) and nonpasserine birds (0.53) ( [56,58]; Figures 3 and 4) all approach that observed for the scaling exponent of thermal conductance.…”
Section: Implications Of Results For Theorymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Likewise, according to our results, these variations cannot be attributed to differences in masses. Furthermore, this is other, but indirect evidence that conductance, metabolic rate or mass-specific metabolic rate did not affect (J), because these are allometric functions of body mass (Kleiber 1961, Herreid andKessel 1967). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The paucity of existence energy data from this study precludes a precise definition of this convergence temperature. The ratio of E.M. computed with Kendeigh's equation (1970) for a 2,086 g bird at ooe (249.1 kcal dayr") to standard metabolism computed from thermal conductance (Herreid and Kessel, 1967) for a bird of the same weight at 0°e (165 kcal day-1) is 1.5. The ratio of E.M. to standard metabolism of the snowy owl at -4.5°e is 1.7.…”
Section: Cold Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…g-l . hr-1 •°C -1) computed from the equation of Herreid and Kessel (1967) (Jog C =: 0.662 -0.536 log W; W measured in g) for a 2,026-g bird is 54.8% larger than the value I measured on the snowy owl at negligible air speed, and that computed from the equation of Lasiewski et al (1967) (log C =: log 0.848 -0.508 log W; C measured in cc O 2 • g-1 . hr-1 .°C-" W measured in g) is 72.1 % larger than the observed value.…”
Section: Thermal Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%