Thermal comfort prediction of air-conditioned and passively cooled engineering testing centres in a higher educational institution using CFD

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the thermal environment of two engineering testing centres cooled via different means using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), focussing on the indoor temperature and air movement. This computational technique has been used in the analysis of thermal environment in buildings where the profiles of thermal comfort parameters, such as air temperature and velocity, are studied.Design/methodology/approachA pilot survey was conducted at two engineering testing centres – a passively cooled workshop and an air-conditioned laboratory. Electronic sensors were used in addition to building design documentation to collect the required information for the CFD model–based prediction of air temperature and velocity distribution patterns for the laboratory and workshop. In the models, both laboratory and workshop were presumed to be fully occupied. The predictions were then compared to empirical data that were obtained from field measurements. Operative temperature and predicted mean vote (PMV)–predicted percentage dissatisfied (PPD) indices were calculated in each case in order to predict thermal comfort levels.FindingsThe simulated results indicated that the mean air temperatures of 21.5°C and 32.4°C in the laboratory and workshop, respectively, were in excess of the recommended thermal comfort ranges specified in MS1525, a local energy efficiency guideline for non-residential buildings. However, air velocities above 0.3 m/s were predicted in the two testing facilities, which would be acceptable to most occupants. Based on the calculated PMV derived from the CFD predictions, the thermal sensation of users of the air-conditioned laboratory was predicted as −1.7 where a “slightly cool” thermal experience would prevail, but machinery operators in the workshop would find their thermal environment too warm with an overall sensation score of 2.4. A comparison of the simulated and empirical results showed that the air temperatures were in good agreement with a percentage of difference below 2%. However, the level of correlation was not replicated for the air velocity results, owing to uncertainties in the selected boundary conditions, which was due to limitations in the measuring instrumentation used.Research limitations/implicationsDue to the varying designs, the simulated results of this study are only applicable to laboratory and workshop facilities located in the tropics.Practical implicationsThe results of this study will enable building services and air-conditioning engineers, especially those who are in charge of the air-conditioning and mechanical ventilation (ACMV) system design and maintenance to have a better understanding of the thermal environment and comfort conditions in the testing facilities, leading to a more effective technical and managerial planning for an optimised thermal comfort management. The method of this work can be extended to the development of CFD models for other testing facilities in educational institutions.Social implicationsThe findings of this work are particularly useful for both industry and academia as the indoor environment of real engineering testing facilities were simulated and analysed. Students and staff in the higher educational institutions would benefit from the improved thermal comfort conditions in these facilities.Originality/valueFor the time being, CFD studies have been carried out to evaluate thermal comfort conditions in various building spaces. However, the information of thermal comfort in the engineering testing centres, of particular those in the hot–humid region are scantily available. The outcomes of this simulation work showed the usefulness of CFD in assisting the management of such facilities not only in the design of efficient ACMV systems but also in enhancing indoor thermal comfort.

Thermal comfort practices for precast concrete building construction projects: towards BIM and IOT integration

“…Meanwhile, according to Liu et al (2019), there is no simple system to describe information content requirements, specification for thermal comfort management practices and information exchanges in construction projects. The integration of thermal comfort parameter information deliveries into a project plan contents of unclear understanding methods of energy efficiency and indoor wellbeing technologies, for instance, control systems, lighting, ventilation, thermal storage and heat recovery, which include temperature differences between indoors and outdoors, building envelope and the efficiency of heating and cooling equipment for thermal industry standardisation (Galagoda et al , 2018; Kwong et al , 2020). The building's thermal system performance in construction activities can be optimised through the deployment of more sophisticated or innovative modelling tools and sensor data visualisation techniques.…”

A Prospective Study of Thermal Comfort in Users in Technical Institution TVET: Workshop Facilities Space

“…Rather, Amin et al (2015) showed the unacceptable thermal conditions in three building of a laboratory that were facilitated with an air conditioning system. Kwong et al (2020) through an experiment on CFD software found the air temperature in both the laboratory and workshop did not comply with the MS 1525 standard, though at a low metabolic rate of 1.0 met. Past findings presented the issues of thermal comfort in educational buildings, focusing on labs and workshop users that are exposed to the sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms, which lead to psychological and physiological effects (N. D. Amin et al, 2012).…”

Analysis of Thermal Comfort Among Workshop Users: At TVET Technical Institution

“…Rather, Amin et al, showed the unacceptable thermal conditions in three building of a laboratory that were facilitated with an air conditioning system. Kwong et al, [9] through an experiment on CFD software found the air temperature in both the laboratory and workshop did not comply with the MS 1525 standard, though at a low metabolic rate of 1.0 met. Past findings presented the issues of thermal comfort in educational buildings, focusing on labs and workshop users that are exposed to the sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms, which lead to psychological and physiological effects [12].…”