Thermal Comfort Assessment: A Case Study at Malaysian Automotive Industry

Abstract

<b>Problem statement:</b> Thermal comfort has a great influence on the productivity and satisfaction of indoor building occupants. The exposure to excessive heat during work may cause discomfort and contributed to low productivity among workers. Malaysia known with its hot and humid weather where in most of the survey study published indicated that workers in Malaysia automotive industries had exposed to excessive temperature while working. The study investigated the thermal comfort level experienced by workers at Malaysian automotive industry. <b>Approach:</b> The study had been conducted at one automotive parts assembly factory in Malaysia. The human subjects for the study constitute operators at tire receiving section of the factory. The environment examined was the relative humidity (%), WBGT, air temperature and radiant temperature (°C) of the surrounding workstation area. The environmental factors were measured using Babuc apparatus, which is capable to measure simultaneously those mentioned environmental factors. The time series data of fluctuating level of factors were plotted to identify the significant changes of factors. Then thermal comfort of the workers was assessed by using ASHRAE thermal sensation scale by using Predicted Mean Vote (PMV). Further Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) was used to estimate the thermal comfort satisfaction of the occupant. Finally the PPD versus PMV were plotted to present the thermal comfort scenario of workers involved in related workstation. <b>Results:</b> The trend of relative humidity curve from the graph also indicated the increasing level of discomfort. The radiant temperature observed seems consistent during the study while there was decreasing of WBGT start from afternoon due to the rain. The study revealed that the PPD value of 54% of the workers population at the workstation are likely to be satisfied with thermal comfort at this station while the PMV index from ASHRAE indicated the value 1.07-1.41. <b>Conclusion:</b> The empirical study from the PPD and PMV index indicated that workers working at this were influenced by the heat. The less of PPD value from 80% of the population satisfied with the thermal comfort showed the environment factors that were not good for worker while the PMV index showed the area of work is slightly warm

Thermal Comfort Assessment-A Study Toward Workers’ Satisfaction in a Low Energy Office Building

“…The mean temperature is approximately 27°C. The relative humidity level can raise exceeding 80% (Ismail et al, 2009). In the effort of knowing the indoor thermal problems inside the LEO building, the occupants must be viewed as important contributors throughout the assessment process as they are the source complaints and a potential source of useful information that can help in assessing the extent of the problem and identifying solutions (Budaiwi, 2007).…”

Modelling of Particle Dispersion in Mechanically Ventilated Space

“…Malaysia, as a country which has a hot and humid climate (Yau, Chew, & Saifullah, 2012) is essential to provide thermal comfort during office hours. Air-conditioning is one of mechanical ventilation system that widely used to provide it (Ismail et al, 2009). However, mechanical ventilation system is could be associated with IAQ problems such high levels of air contaminants due to the insufficient of airflow (Meckler, 1991).…”

Predicted percentage dissatisfied (PPD) model evaluation of evaporative cooling potentials of some selected cities in Nigeria

“…The predictive mean vote (PMV) is a parameter for assessing thermal comfort in an occupied zone based on the conditions of metabolic rate, clothing, air speed besides temperature and relative humidity [2]. The PMV is expressed on the 7-point ASHRAE scale of thermal sensation [11].…”

“…The best one realistically hopes to achieve is a thermal environment that satisfies the majority of people in an occupied space [1]. Studies have shown that 80% of occupants is a reasonable limit for the minimum number of people who should be thermally comfortable in an environment [2]. There are passive, active and hybrid means of achieving thermal comfort.…”