1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6031(97)00040-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal behaviour of starch and oxidized starch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This temperature was considered as the initial pyrolysis of the starch molecules. The results, as also described by Soliman et al (1997), suggested that the oxidized starches were more sensitive to the thermal degradation. The mass loss showed in Table 8 occurred in the temperature range of 150 -600 °C and was higher for the native starches than for the modified ones.…”
Section: Thermal Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This temperature was considered as the initial pyrolysis of the starch molecules. The results, as also described by Soliman et al (1997), suggested that the oxidized starches were more sensitive to the thermal degradation. The mass loss showed in Table 8 occurred in the temperature range of 150 -600 °C and was higher for the native starches than for the modified ones.…”
Section: Thermal Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Higher onset temperatures were found for the native than for the modified starches. Soliman et al (1997) studied the native and potassium permanganate-modified corn starches and also found higher onset temperatures for the native (275 °C) than for the modified samples (250, 237, 230 °C). This temperature was considered as the initial pyrolysis of the starch molecules.…”
Section: Thermal Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thermogravimetry also allows evaluating water content in the sample. Soliman et al (1997) used the limit of 150 ºC for such evaluation. It was observed that the loss of moisture and other easily volatile materials and the posterior loss of mass of the samples had a variation of approximately 2%.…”
Section: Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%