2006
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-24-835-2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal, atmospheric and ionospheric anomalies around the time of the Colima M7.8 earthquake of 21 January 2003

Abstract: Abstract. The paper examines the possible relationship of anomalous variations of different atmospheric and ionospheric parameters observed around the time of a strong earthquake (M w 7.8) which occurred in Mexico (state of Colima) on 21 January 2003. These variations are interpreted within the framework of the developed model of the Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere coupling. The main attention is focused on the processes in the near ground layer of the atmosphere involving the ionization of air by radon, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many scientists have studied the theory of pre-seismic thermal variations (Freund et al, 2007;Pulinets et al, 2006;Saraf et al, 2009), there is still no comprehensive and widely accepted geophysical explanation for thermal changes prior to seismic activity. To get rid of false predictions caused by random noise or by chance coincidence, any earthquake-predicting method (whether short-term or long-term) needs to be evaluated statistically (Kagan, 1997;Geller, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although many scientists have studied the theory of pre-seismic thermal variations (Freund et al, 2007;Pulinets et al, 2006;Saraf et al, 2009), there is still no comprehensive and widely accepted geophysical explanation for thermal changes prior to seismic activity. To get rid of false predictions caused by random noise or by chance coincidence, any earthquake-predicting method (whether short-term or long-term) needs to be evaluated statistically (Kagan, 1997;Geller, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using NOAA AVHRR satellite thermal images, Tronin used thermal remote sensing data to observe abnormal infrared radiation in a seismically active region in central Asia (Tronin, 1996). Analogous remotely sensed images were also used in Russia, China, India, Mexico and other countries (Choudhury et al, 2006;Genzano et al, 2007;Ouzounov and Freund, 2004;Ouzounov et al, 2007;Pulinets et al, 2006;Qiang et al, 1997;Tronin, 2000). Furthermore, thermal remote sensing products have also been employed in the study of the relationship between thermal variations and seismic activity, such as outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) and temperature of a black body (TBB) Zhang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SLHF increased by approximately 50 W/m 2 peaking at 115 W/m 2 over 3-23 days before earthquakes in the Middle East (Mansouri Daneshvar et al, 2014). SLHF can also be a possible precursor to coastal earthquakes because anomalous SLHF tends to be more intensive over sea surface than over land surface (Cervone et al, 2004;Cervone et al, 2006). The analysis of coastal earthquakes shows that the SLHF increased abnormally a few days before earthquakes, which is the result of the increase in surface temperature in seismically 230 active areas .…”
Section: Slhf (W/mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is simple and effective; thus, it is always used in interpreting preliminary pre-seismic anomalies. Several studies have utilized this method, such as in the aerosol anomaly (Qin et al, 2014b), SHLF anomaly (Dey andSingh, 2003), anomalies of multiple parameters Singh et al, 2010a), and thermal anomalies in AVHRR and MODIS brightness temperature (Saraf et al, 2012).…”
Section: Visual Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%