2010
DOI: 10.2113/gssgfbull.181.4.363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal anomalies and geological structures in the Provence basin: Implications for hydrothermal circulations at depth

Abstract: International audienceDeep temperature estimates previously made in France show three main positive thermal anomalies, one of them centred on the Provence basin (south-east France) between Marseille and Montpellier. This study presents newly corrected temperature data and improved temperature maps in order to (i) validate or to invalidate the thermal anomalies previously identified and (ii) relate deep temperatures with major geological structures of the area. Although thermal gradient varies from place to pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…other similar studies [41,78], whereas McKenna and Blackwell indicate a maximum velocity value of 3.7 × 10 −10 m/s, generally too low to disturb significantly a thermal field (see the detailed numerical models by López and Smith [78], where significant distortion of the thermal field is obtained for velocity around 10 −7 m/s). In our numerical scheme being identical as in other studies [79,80] where other benchmark tests were performed [81,82], we validate our benchmark test of the Dixie Valley hydrothermal system.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…other similar studies [41,78], whereas McKenna and Blackwell indicate a maximum velocity value of 3.7 × 10 −10 m/s, generally too low to disturb significantly a thermal field (see the detailed numerical models by López and Smith [78], where significant distortion of the thermal field is obtained for velocity around 10 −7 m/s). In our numerical scheme being identical as in other studies [79,80] where other benchmark tests were performed [81,82], we validate our benchmark test of the Dixie Valley hydrothermal system.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In addition, the evolution of permeabilities with depth is often considered as diminishing because of the effect of confinement on fracture opening (Earnest & Boutt, 2014;Ingebritsen & Manning, 1999;Saar & Manga, 2004). Such depth-dependent permeability is often used in numerical models to explain the spatial distribution of subsurface thermal anomalies (e.g., Garibaldi et al, 2010;Guillou-Frottier et al, 2013). However, this assumption is actually not sufficiently constrained by deep data, and other factors (tectonics and lithology) seem to control the evolution of permeability with depth (Ranjram et al, 2015;Taillefer, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Yang ; Garibaldi et al . ). In this study, various models with different configurations of fault zones (location, spacing and orientation) that straddle the unconformity between the permeable sandstone and relatively impermeable basement indicate that if other hydraulic conditions remain unchanged, the presence of fault zone(s) can have significant effects on the patterns of the convective circulation, especially the flow adjacent to the fault zone(s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%