2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal and mechanical aspects of the response of embedded retaining walls used as shallow geothermal heat exchangers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the heat exchange process proceeds from the initial transient condition towards a steady state condition, the difference in temperature between the air inside the excavation and the soil becomes the predominant factor, to the detriment mainly of the panel width. This is consistent with the long term steady state analysis carried out by Bourne Webb et al (2016) which showed heat transfer to be dominated by the interface with the inside of the excavation. The effect of pipe spacing correspondingly decreases as time progresses, but always remains among the top three parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, as the heat exchange process proceeds from the initial transient condition towards a steady state condition, the difference in temperature between the air inside the excavation and the soil becomes the predominant factor, to the detriment mainly of the panel width. This is consistent with the long term steady state analysis carried out by Bourne Webb et al (2016) which showed heat transfer to be dominated by the interface with the inside of the excavation. The effect of pipe spacing correspondingly decreases as time progresses, but always remains among the top three parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…By the end of the numerical simulation the heat transfer rates drop to <20 W/m 2 . These values are comparable to those presented by Bourne Webb et al (2016) and slightly lower than those suggested by Brandl (2006) as pre design values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations