2023
DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2022.022221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Analysis of Turbine Blades with Thermal Barrier Coatings Using燰irtual Wall Thickness Method

Abstract: A virtual wall thickness method is developed to simulate the temperature field of turbine blades with thermal barrier coatings (TBCs), to simplify the modeling process and improve the calculation efficiency. The results show that the virtual wall thickness method can improve the mesh quality by 20%, reduce the number of meshes by 76.7% and save the calculation time by 35.5%, compared with the traditional real wall thickness method. The average calculation error of the two methods is between 0.21% and 0.93%. Fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, through iterative solving, the results of all elements are combined to obtain the finite element solution for the entire region [140][141][142][143]. The flexibility and adaptability of the finite element method are significant, but it poses challenges in terms of program design and involves complexities in data preparation, along with potential issues of data oscillations during computation [143,144]. For phase-field equations, the phase parameter changes most rapidly at the interface, making it crucial to refine the finite element grid in these regions.…”
Section: Grand Potential Phase-field Sintering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, through iterative solving, the results of all elements are combined to obtain the finite element solution for the entire region [140][141][142][143]. The flexibility and adaptability of the finite element method are significant, but it poses challenges in terms of program design and involves complexities in data preparation, along with potential issues of data oscillations during computation [143,144]. For phase-field equations, the phase parameter changes most rapidly at the interface, making it crucial to refine the finite element grid in these regions.…”
Section: Grand Potential Phase-field Sintering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%