2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal analysis of fluidized particle flows in a finned tube solar receiver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluidized particle-in-tube concept has been extensively proven, both by on-sun heating of the fluidized particles (Flamant et al, 2013;Benoit et al, 2015;Perez Lopez et al, 2016;Le Gal et al, 2019) and by characterization of the heat transfer mechanisms and hydrodynamics in the riser (Boissiere et al, 2015;Reyes Urrutia et al, 2016;Ansart et al, 2017;García-Triñanes et al, 2018). Operation up to 750°C, a temperature level much higher than that used in the molten salts solar plant, has been demonstrated.…”
Section: The Compartmented Fluidized Bed Solar Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fluidized particle-in-tube concept has been extensively proven, both by on-sun heating of the fluidized particles (Flamant et al, 2013;Benoit et al, 2015;Perez Lopez et al, 2016;Le Gal et al, 2019) and by characterization of the heat transfer mechanisms and hydrodynamics in the riser (Boissiere et al, 2015;Reyes Urrutia et al, 2016;Ansart et al, 2017;García-Triñanes et al, 2018). Operation up to 750°C, a temperature level much higher than that used in the molten salts solar plant, has been demonstrated.…”
Section: The Compartmented Fluidized Bed Solar Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operation up to 750°C, a temperature level much higher than that used in the molten salts solar plant, has been demonstrated. Bed-to-wall heat transfer coefficient in the order of 500-700 W m −2 K −1 with ordinary tubes (Zhang et al, 2016b) and 1,200 W m −2 K −1 with finned tubes (Le Gal et al, 2019) have been reported. The role played by the multistage FB heat exchanger has also been highlighted (Gomez-Garcia et al, 2017).…”
Section: The Compartmented Fluidized Bed Solar Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A pilot scale demo-unit is currently under construction within the framework of Next-CSP European projects [25]. The main advantages of the latter concept are the use of a tubular receiver similar to the standard receiver of solar power tower and small diameter particles that exhibit high wall-to-fluidized bed heat transfer coefficient [26]. The main drawback is using an indirect heating configuration of the HTF that results in strong constraints on the absorber wall temperature and in the choice of a cavity receiver concept to reduce the radiative losses.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control of incident solar flux distribution on the tube wall is mandatory to avoid hot spots; aiming strategy is proposed in [31]. Thermo-mechanical behavior of the tubes submitted to high thermal gradient between the irradiated front side and the back side as reported in [26] is one of the most critical issue at high temperature. This challenge can be addressed by increasing the particle mixing (see above cited "turbulent fluidization regime [33]") and the heat transfer coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%