2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/808/1/18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Absorption as the Cause of Gigahertz-Peaked Spectra in Pulsars and Magnetars

Abstract: We present a model that explains the observed deviation of the spectra of some pulsars and magnetars from the power-law spectra which are seen in the bulk of the pulsar population. Our model is based on the assumption that the observed variety of pulsar spectra can be naturally explained by the thermal free-free absorption that takes place in the surroundings of the pulsars. In this context, the variety of the pulsar spectra can be explained according to the shape, density and temperature of the absorbing medi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the most probable absorber are the PWN since their presence is known around these pulsars. The ne values for the four pulsars in this case are between 50 and 200 cm −3 , and the corresponding Te are between 150 and 2500 K. Lewandowski et al (2015a) explored a simplified model of the asymmetric bow-shocked PWN, assuming an uniform electron density and temperature across the medium, and showed that the GPS behaviour is affected by the line of sight towards the PWN. For instance the line of sights passing through the tail would cover the maximum absorber size and result in GPS spectra.…”
Section: The Gps Behaviour In Pwnmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the most probable absorber are the PWN since their presence is known around these pulsars. The ne values for the four pulsars in this case are between 50 and 200 cm −3 , and the corresponding Te are between 150 and 2500 K. Lewandowski et al (2015a) explored a simplified model of the asymmetric bow-shocked PWN, assuming an uniform electron density and temperature across the medium, and showed that the GPS behaviour is affected by the line of sight towards the PWN. For instance the line of sights passing through the tail would cover the maximum absorber size and result in GPS spectra.…”
Section: The Gps Behaviour In Pwnmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The GPS pulsars are usually associated with young energetic sources which are found in peculiar environments like Pulsar wind nebulae (PWN), HII regions, Supernova remnants (SNR), etc. This motivated Kijak et al (2011b); Lewandowski et al (2015a); Rajwade, Lorimer & Anderson (2016) to suggest the thermal absorption model based on the initial ideas of Sieber (1973), where the pulsar emission is absorbed in the specialized environments, ⋆ e-mail: rahulbasu.astro@gmail.com as a likely candidate for GPS behaviour in pulsars. The model has been subsequently used by Basu et al (2016); Kijak et al (2017) to successfully explain the spectral behaviour in a majority of GPS pulsars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all three cases the spectra exhibit GPS characteristics. The thermal free-free absorption in the intervening medium first proposed by Kijak et al (2011aKijak et al ( , 2013 to explain GPS behaviour and further extended by Lewandowski et al (2015b) has been utilized to model the spectrum in each case with the spectral fits and errors during fitting shown as solid and broken lines respectively, the details of which are presented in the next section. The GPS behaviour is characterized by the turnover in the pulsar radio spectra around the GHz frequency range.…”
Section: Spectral Nature Of Psr B1800−21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. We consider two cases for absorption: (i) cold, molecular clouds with ionization fronts for which Te = 200 K and EM = 1000 cm −6 (Lewandowski et al 2015) (hereafter, model B); (ii) hot, ionized magnetar ejecta/circum-burst medium for which Te = 8000 K and EM = 1.5 × 10 6 cm −6 (hereafter, model C). The value of EM for model C has been chosen from a range of values reported in Rajwade et al (2016), Kulkarni et al (2015) and Lewandowski et al (2015).…”
Section: Models Including Free-free Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%