2013
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3035-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Ablation Versus Repeated Hepatic Resection for Recurrent Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract: Repeated HR and TAT are both effective treatments for RICC with similar overall efficacies. TAT should be preferred in any cases when the RICC is ≤3 cm in diameter and technically feasible. However, for large tumors (>3 cm), repeated HR may be a better choice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
90
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
90
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for patients with recurrent ICC after surgery, it has been reported that ablation therapy (RFA or microwave ablation) have been reported to have an overall efficacy similar to that of repeated hepatic resection especially in patients with tumors up to 3 cm in diameter (24). This observation is consistent with previous reports examining the use of ablation therapies for ICC, and suggests that although ablation therapy might be effective in selected patients with recurrent ICC, its indication should be limited according to tumor size (14,16).…”
Section: Prognostic Impact and Role Of Rfa In Multidisciplinary Treatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for patients with recurrent ICC after surgery, it has been reported that ablation therapy (RFA or microwave ablation) have been reported to have an overall efficacy similar to that of repeated hepatic resection especially in patients with tumors up to 3 cm in diameter (24). This observation is consistent with previous reports examining the use of ablation therapies for ICC, and suggests that although ablation therapy might be effective in selected patients with recurrent ICC, its indication should be limited according to tumor size (14,16).…”
Section: Prognostic Impact and Role Of Rfa In Multidisciplinary Treatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the largest series comparing ablation therapies with repeated resection for recurrent ICC, the major complication rate was 3.9% after ablation therapies, while it was 46.9% after repeated resection (24). Therefore, in a selected population with small recurrent tumors, ablation therapies could be a firstline treatment comparable with surgical resection.…”
Section: Prognostic Impact and Role Of Rfa In Multidisciplinary Treatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable interest has been paid to various treatment options against ICC recurrence such as surgical treatment,6, 7, 8 chemotherapy,9 radiation therapy,7 radiofrequency ablation (RFA),10, 11 and transarterial chemotherapy 12, 13 with various degrees of success. In recent reports, aggressive surgical treatment for ICC recurrence led to good patient survival after recurrence, with a 3‐year overall survival (OS) rate of 25%,14 40%,6 and 100% 7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The postoperative recurrence rate of ICC remains high, and occurs in 50-80 % of cases even after curative resection [11,21,[38][39][40]72]. No effective treatments have been established for unresectable or recurrent ICC, and the prognosis of patients with these advanced ICCs is extremely poor.…”
Section: Treatments For Recurrent Iccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimens can help to improve the postoperative outcomes of patients with ICC as many of them have advanced disease. Recently, aggressive treatments, including repeated hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy are increasingly being used to treat recurrent ICC, which may prolong patient survival [21,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Despite the many advances in ICC treatment, no standard strategy has been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%