The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Trumping the Mainstream 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315144993-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There’s something about Marine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lately, the study of the PRR's mainstreaming has garnered significant academic attention (see, among others, Akkerman et al 2016;Herman and Muldoon 2018;Moffitt 2022). Despite the prolific nature of the debate, critiques have emerged about the vague employment of the concept of mainstreaming (Brown et al 2023;Moffitt 2022), with a lack of specificity in empirically distinguishing its theoretical dimensions, which are, according to the literature, the de-radicalization of issue positions, expansion of programmes, softening of anti-establishment stances and an intensified focus on the party's competence (Paxton and Peace 2021).…”
Section: Access To Power and Mainstreaming Between National And Localmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, the study of the PRR's mainstreaming has garnered significant academic attention (see, among others, Akkerman et al 2016;Herman and Muldoon 2018;Moffitt 2022). Despite the prolific nature of the debate, critiques have emerged about the vague employment of the concept of mainstreaming (Brown et al 2023;Moffitt 2022), with a lack of specificity in empirically distinguishing its theoretical dimensions, which are, according to the literature, the de-radicalization of issue positions, expansion of programmes, softening of anti-establishment stances and an intensified focus on the party's competence (Paxton and Peace 2021).…”
Section: Access To Power and Mainstreaming Between National And Localmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, Macron explicitly and repeatedly described Le Pen as his key opponent, a polar counterpart in a newly configured political space. Macron was the second most likely candidate after Benoit Hamon to talk about Le Pen in the 2017 campaign (Herman & Muldoon, 2019, p. 254). Macron had important strategic incentives to do so: Having an opponent associated to extremism virtually guaranteed his victory in the second round of the 2017 election and has done so again in 2022—albeit with a shrinking margin.…”
Section: How To Articulate a New Political Divisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the candidate pursued a classical strategy of extremist ostracisation in the name of democracy (e.g. Macron in Brézet et al, 2017; Herman & Muldoon, 2019, p. 261). At the same time, Macron also debated with Le Pen and described her as a legitimate opponent.…”
Section: How To Articulate a New Political Divisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anything that deviates from this homogeneity is considered a threat (xenophobia). Consequently, welfare policies should put the native, homogenous 'people' first (welfare chauvinism), and the legal system should work to protect the nation and its 'people' against perceived internal and external threats and enemies (authoritarianism) (Mudde, 2000; see also Hainsworth, 2000;Herman and Muldoon, 2019;Rydgren, 2018).…”
Section: A Far-right Sense Of Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%