2019
DOI: 10.1177/1077801219835050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There Is Virtually No Excuse: The Frequency and Predictors of College Students’ Bystander Intervention Behaviors Directed at Online Victimization

Abstract: Research shows that a large percentage of college students have experienced online victimization. However, bystander intervention behaviors directed at online contexts are absent from both the online victimization and bystander intervention research. With a sample of undergraduate college students, the current study explores the frequency and predictors of bystander intervention behaviors in response to online situations. Results show that a majority of students intervened during the past academic year when fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bystander model targets all community members as potential bystanders and seeks to engage them in prosocial behaviors that establish intolerance of violence as the norm resulting in the ultimate reduction of violence. Bystander intervention programs have been utilized to address many types of violent behaviors such as bullying, online victimization, social exclusion, sexual violence, and intimate partner violence (Coker et al, 2020;Emery et al, 2019;Henson et al, 2020;Ingram et al, 2019;Katz & Klainberg, 2019). The bystander approach is supported by research that demonstrates a number of positive outcomes including increased levels of knowledge about dangerous behaviors, increased self-efficacy, and greater willingness to intervene in prosocial ways (Moran et al, 2019;Orsini et al, 2019;Power & Leili, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bystander model targets all community members as potential bystanders and seeks to engage them in prosocial behaviors that establish intolerance of violence as the norm resulting in the ultimate reduction of violence. Bystander intervention programs have been utilized to address many types of violent behaviors such as bullying, online victimization, social exclusion, sexual violence, and intimate partner violence (Coker et al, 2020;Emery et al, 2019;Henson et al, 2020;Ingram et al, 2019;Katz & Klainberg, 2019). The bystander approach is supported by research that demonstrates a number of positive outcomes including increased levels of knowledge about dangerous behaviors, increased self-efficacy, and greater willingness to intervene in prosocial ways (Moran et al, 2019;Orsini et al, 2019;Power & Leili, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keep in mind, however, that bystander intervention in North American institutions of higher education prioritizes the prevention of offline rather than online abuse. Furthermore, as noted by Henson et al (2020), "bystander intervention behaviors directed at online contexts are absent from both the online victimization and bystander intervention research" (p. 505).…”
Section: Preventing and Responding To University/college Campus Polyvictimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though bystander intervention was found to be an effective means of preventing both offline and online victimization (Henson et al, 2020), some cautionary notes are necessary. First, there is evidence of short-term effectiveness, but we know little about its long-term effects.…”
Section: Preventing and Responding To University/college Campus Polyvictimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the effectiveness of this approach, bystander intervention by peers is relatively infrequent with 25% or fewer of student participants in surveys reporting having intervened in bullying episodes (O'Connell et al, 1999). Furthermore, in a recent study (Henson et al, 2020), when students were faced with a situation in which they had an opportunity to intervene in some capacity to potentially prevent online victimization, approximately 29-58% attempted to intervene in some capacity, indicating bystander intervention programs are not sufficient in dealing with bullying. Borgwald and Theixos (2013) advocate a broader integrative approach to bullying programs that includes both victims of bullying and students who bully.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%