2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There is only one winner: The negative impact of red deer density on roe deer numbers and distribution in the Słowiński National Park and its vicinity

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Richard et al (2010) showed that the body mass of roe deer fawns decreased consistently in areas characterized by higher red deer population density, most likely as a consequence of the negative impact of red deer on vegetation which reduces the amount of high‐quality food for roe deer. A similar result was obtained by Borkowski et al (2021) when they found that roe deer population density was notably lower within the Słowiński National Park (where higher red deer population densities were recorded) compared to the neighbouring non‐protected areas where hunting is allowed. They assumed that red deer at higher population density most likely exert a negative impact on the vegetation, thus reducing feeding resources for roe deer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Richard et al (2010) showed that the body mass of roe deer fawns decreased consistently in areas characterized by higher red deer population density, most likely as a consequence of the negative impact of red deer on vegetation which reduces the amount of high‐quality food for roe deer. A similar result was obtained by Borkowski et al (2021) when they found that roe deer population density was notably lower within the Słowiński National Park (where higher red deer population densities were recorded) compared to the neighbouring non‐protected areas where hunting is allowed. They assumed that red deer at higher population density most likely exert a negative impact on the vegetation, thus reducing feeding resources for roe deer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, it represents one of the main elements affecting population dynamics and distribution (Begon et al, 2006), along with metabolic responses of wild species (Fattorini et al, 2018; Filacorda et al, 2021; Santicchia et al, 2018). Resource competition between red and roe deer (Borkowski et al, 2021; Richard et al, 2010), as well as between wild boar and roe deer (Melberg, 2012), have already been documented and may significantly affect the roe deer long‐term physiological stress response. Furthermore, even habitat quality may exert a key role in shaping the HPA axis response (Jaimez et al, 2011; Martínez‐Mota et al, 2007; Rangel‐Negrín et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Capreolus capreolus is a browser and income-breeder species whose population growth rate is sensitive to hunting pressure for lower browsing pressure levels [37,65,66] and is negatively affected by Cervus elaphus abundance since their diet partially overlaps. The diet of Capreolus capreolus is more restrictive than the diet of the Cervus elaphus [51,52,[67][68][69]. Harvest statistics are thus susceptible to poorly representing the standing population of Capreolus capreolus because of the higher density dependence of population growth rate than red deer in the conditions of the study.…”
Section: Study Scope and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Scotland, red deer appear to exert a competitive effect on roe deer. Studies demonstrate a negative effect of red deer density on roe deer numbers, with resource competition potentially causing a negative impact on roe deer body mass (Borkowski et al., 2021; Latham et al., 1997; Richard et al., 2010). With sika deer, some limited research demonstrates the potential for sika deer to be displaced by red deer, and for high red deer densities to reduce fertility in sika deer (Putman & Pemberton, 2022; Raymond, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%