2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There Is No Way to Avoid Systematic Prostate Biopsies in Addition to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, Stabile et al . in a multicenter study failed to identify those men who might safely benefit of MRI‐TBx alone 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, Stabile et al . in a multicenter study failed to identify those men who might safely benefit of MRI‐TBx alone 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risks of infection, bleeding and pain associated with additional cores sampling should be considered when trying to maximize the detection of csPCa 3,4 . Avoiding SBx would reduce the number of biopsy cores and detection of low‐grade disease 5 . In contrast, TBx alone could miss up to 15% of csPCa 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to our risk calculator, the model developed by Stabile et al predicts csPCa in SBx. Their model ultimately included age, PSA, Prostate volume, number of MRI lesions, PIRADS score and the biopsy setting (biopsy naive vs previous negative biopsy patients) [10]. However, the DCA showed modest clinical benefit in the external validation cohort and the authors concluded that the number of systematic biopsies spared compared with the number of aggressive PCa missed is negligible.…”
Section: Risk Calculatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several multivariable models to predict negative SBx have been developed to avoid systematic cores at the time of target biopsy [10,11]. None of these models showed excellent accuracy, and their clinical benefit is questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have confirmed the additional value of multi parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) guided biopsies and recent guidelines support mpMRI-based targeted biopsies in biopsy naïve patients [1] [2]. mpMRI-guided biopsy while omitting random biopsies will be at cost of missing 5% -10% of significant cancer [3] [4]. Sensitivity of mpMRI is lowest for lesions located ventrally in the prostate in the transition zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%