2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2013.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There is no such thing as the ‘Ediacara Biota’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially true in the Neoproterozoic, with numerous extinct lineages existing alongside the ancestors of extant discoidal organisms. In addition, structural elements within the water column, including more delicate frondose structures, are far more difficult to preserve than body parts within or on the substrate [51,103,104]. As a result, it may be impossible to identify whether or not discoidal structures are holdfasts of epibenthic frondose organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is especially true in the Neoproterozoic, with numerous extinct lineages existing alongside the ancestors of extant discoidal organisms. In addition, structural elements within the water column, including more delicate frondose structures, are far more difficult to preserve than body parts within or on the substrate [51,103,104]. As a result, it may be impossible to identify whether or not discoidal structures are holdfasts of epibenthic frondose organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preservation of imprints or traces from soft-bodies necessitates a general lack of heavy bioturbation [92]. As in the case of many Ediacaran sites, certain body elements may not have been preserved due to removal in the water column or labile tissue destruction prior to complete lithification [104]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the modern dating era it was widely considered that the Ediacaran biota considerably pre‐dated the Cambrian (Laflamme et al , ; MacGabhann, ), and even after redating placed the two biotas in close temporal proximity, there has been a tendency to regard them as being separated by a mass extinction (e.g. Amthor et al , ; Narbonne, ; Darroch et al , ).…”
Section: The Fate Of the Ediacarans And The Rise Of The Bilateriansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid future confusion and unhelpful generalisations, careful and consistent application of terminology across the field, and an agreed taxonomic framework for the description of Ediacaran taxa, are now required (cf. Brasier et al, 2012;MacGabhann, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%