“…Even though the research team did not enquire about such attempts, the participants viewed them as important enough to raise, suggesting that residents are not only considering the possibility of another flood, but also undertaking mental work to make themselves less emotionally vulnerable, despite remaining physically and/or socially vulnerable. This is of course paradoxical: while the residents seek to restore ontological security, that is, routine and stability, they create simultaneously emotional distance from their milieus, which may, to some extent, prevent them from developing place attachment (Burley et al, 2007; Windsong, 2010) or locally em‐placed social capital (Aldrich, 2012; Aldrich and Meyer, 2014) capable of providing emotional support in a time of disaster in the future.…”