2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2009.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There is no place like home: Complexities in exploring home and place attachment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Homeownership decreases mobility plans, as homeowners are 2.5 times more likely than renters to intend to remain in their neighbourhood 1 year after the survey (odds ratio = 2.485), and 2.4 times more likely to be there 5 years later (odds ratio = 2.389). This finding probably relates to the affected properties’ decrease in value (Bin & Polasky, ), which renders them harder to sell, as well as to homeowners’ increased emotional and social investments in the neighbourhoods where they have purchased homes (Windsong, ). The perception of one's neighbourhood being an excellent place to live increases the odds of planning to stay in one's neighbourhood, both in the short and medium term (odds ratios of 2.764 and 2.473).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Homeownership decreases mobility plans, as homeowners are 2.5 times more likely than renters to intend to remain in their neighbourhood 1 year after the survey (odds ratio = 2.485), and 2.4 times more likely to be there 5 years later (odds ratio = 2.389). This finding probably relates to the affected properties’ decrease in value (Bin & Polasky, ), which renders them harder to sell, as well as to homeowners’ increased emotional and social investments in the neighbourhoods where they have purchased homes (Windsong, ). The perception of one's neighbourhood being an excellent place to live increases the odds of planning to stay in one's neighbourhood, both in the short and medium term (odds ratios of 2.764 and 2.473).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…In the post‐disaster context, Morrice () highlights a “powerful emotional quality associated with how people relate to place, recognizing that return decisions are emotionally driven and not necessarily based on material constraints” (33). This is particularly true for homeowners who report a larger social and emotional place connection than renters (Windsong, ). Additionally, such factors as political trust (Reinhardt, ), emotion and nostalgia (Morrice, ), and connection to place (Landry, Bin, Hindsley, Whitehead, & Wilson, ) also play a role in return decision‐making by encouraging return migration.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the research team did not enquire about such attempts, the participants viewed them as important enough to raise, suggesting that residents are not only considering the possibility of another flood, but also undertaking mental work to make themselves less emotionally vulnerable, despite remaining physically and/or socially vulnerable. This is of course paradoxical: while the residents seek to restore ontological security, that is, routine and stability, they create simultaneously emotional distance from their milieus, which may, to some extent, prevent them from developing place attachment (Burley et al, 2007; Windsong, 2010) or locally em‐placed social capital (Aldrich, 2012; Aldrich and Meyer, 2014) capable of providing emotional support in a time of disaster in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This firm position is what we call home" (in Larsen, 2008, page 24). Home is a liberating place where one feels a friendly atmosphere, freedom to be, restored, a space that one controls and where privacy can exist (Seamon, 1979), independently from home ownership (Windsong, 2010). Dupuis and Thorns (1998) argue that ontological security (the need to be protected from the insecurities of the contemporary world) is maintained when "Home is a site of constancy in the social and material environment; home is a spatial context in which the day to day routines of humane existence are performed; home is a site where people feel most in control of their lives because they feel free from surveillance…; home is a secure base around which identities are constructed."…”
Section: Nestingmentioning
confidence: 99%