1999
DOI: 10.2307/2586622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There exist exactly two maximal strictly relevant extensions of the relevant logic R

Abstract: In [60] N. Belnap presented an 8-element matrix for the relevant logic R with the following property: if in an implication A → B the formulas A and B do not have a common variable then there exists a valuation v such that v (A → B) does not belong to the set of designated elements of this matrix. A 6-element matrix of this kind can be found in: R. Routley, R.K. Meyer, V. Plumwood and R.T. Brady [82], Below we prove that the logics generated by these two matrices are the only maximal extensions of the relevant … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first assertion of the next theorem has unpublished antecedents in the work of relevance logicians. A corresponding result for 'relevant algebras' is reported in [66,Prop. 5], but the claim and proof below are simpler.…”
Section: Square-increasing Irlsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first assertion of the next theorem has unpublished antecedents in the work of relevance logicians. A corresponding result for 'relevant algebras' is reported in [66,Prop. 5], but the claim and proof below are simpler.…”
Section: Square-increasing Irlsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The main motivation for RA is that it algebraizes the logic R. The algebraization process for R t and DMM carries over verbatim to R and RA, provided we use (12) as a formal device for eliminating all mention of e. Further work on relevant algebras can be found in [18,21,37,38,52,54,65,66].…”
Section: Relevant Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the pretabular logics described in this paper do not solve all questions concerning pretabularity of /?-logics: in particular the logics described above are not extensions of any of the two maximal strictly relevant extensions of the logic R (cf. K. Swirydowicz [1999]).…”
Section: Proof Of the Fundamental Theoremmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4.11]. A finitely generated relevant algebra A has a least and a greatest element, which form a Boolean subalgebra [26,Prop. 5], and A itself is a reduct-not merely a subreduct-of a De Morgan monoid.…”
Section: The Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%