1999
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There are two types of psychometric function: A theory of cue combination in the processing of complex stimuli with implications for categorical perception.

Abstract: Psychometric functions are customarily fitted using normal distribution functions. However, categorical perception identification tasks give functions that are more sigmoid than the normal distribution (M. Treisman, A. Faulkner, P. L. N. Naish, & B. S. Rosner, 1995). This can be explained by a theory of discrimination, cue combination theory (CCT), presented here. This theory assumes that complex stimuli (e.g., speech sounds) are composed of components or cues that vary in informativeness. The decision mechani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
(239 reference statements)
2
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…He argues that speech perception fundamentally involves a process of feature cue parsing in which temporally distributed acoustic feature value cues are grouped and integrated into unitized feature representations that may be aligned with segmental positions. The notion of feature cue parsing is consistent with evidence concerning the distribution of feature cues (Bailey & Summerfield, 1980;Stevens, 1998), the finding that listeners integrate multiple cues to the same feature (Best, Morrongiello, & Robson, 1981;Hodgson & Miller, 1996;Parker, Diehl, & Kluender, 1986;Repp, 1982;Sinnott & Saporita, 2000;Summerfield & Haggard, 1977;Treiman, 1999) and evidence that listeners may be induced to misalign acoustic feature cues with segmental representations (Repp, 1978). The feature cue parsing view suggests that English place assimilation is best viewed as a process that intermeshes feature cues associated with neighboring segments, and argues that the resultant featural ambiguity is resolved as a natural product of the feature parsing process.…”
Section: Universal Perceptual Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…He argues that speech perception fundamentally involves a process of feature cue parsing in which temporally distributed acoustic feature value cues are grouped and integrated into unitized feature representations that may be aligned with segmental positions. The notion of feature cue parsing is consistent with evidence concerning the distribution of feature cues (Bailey & Summerfield, 1980;Stevens, 1998), the finding that listeners integrate multiple cues to the same feature (Best, Morrongiello, & Robson, 1981;Hodgson & Miller, 1996;Parker, Diehl, & Kluender, 1986;Repp, 1982;Sinnott & Saporita, 2000;Summerfield & Haggard, 1977;Treiman, 1999) and evidence that listeners may be induced to misalign acoustic feature cues with segmental representations (Repp, 1978). The feature cue parsing view suggests that English place assimilation is best viewed as a process that intermeshes feature cues associated with neighboring segments, and argues that the resultant featural ambiguity is resolved as a natural product of the feature parsing process.…”
Section: Universal Perceptual Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Average relationships remain unclear. Categorical speech perception tasks require both perceptual and decision-making skills (Treisman, 1999).…”
Section: Categorical Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But d9 can also be embedded in a theoretical context in which it estimates a parameter of a model, since SDT allows us to frame models of underlying processes and estimate their parameters. An advantage of this approach to understanding psychological processes is that it allows predictions to be made and tested and it allows us to relate the results of different types of psychophysical procedures (Swets, 1964;Treisman, 1999;Treisman & Watts, 1966). S9 cannot serve these purposes.…”
Section: Balakrishnan's (1998b) New Measure Of Sensitivity S9mentioning
confidence: 99%