1995
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v86.9.3613.bloodjournal8693613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapy-related acute leukemia associated with t(11q23) after primary acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21): a report of two cases [letter]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An MLL rearrangement was reported in three patients with t(11;16)(q23;p13)-associated, therapyrelated acute leukemia (Hunger et al, 1993;Roulston et al, 1995;Rowley et al, 1996). We found the same translocation in a child with therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (t-CMML) (Bennett et al, 1976), and we detected a novel MLL-CBP fusion transcript in his neoplastic cells.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…An MLL rearrangement was reported in three patients with t(11;16)(q23;p13)-associated, therapyrelated acute leukemia (Hunger et al, 1993;Roulston et al, 1995;Rowley et al, 1996). We found the same translocation in a child with therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (t-CMML) (Bennett et al, 1976), and we detected a novel MLL-CBP fusion transcript in his neoplastic cells.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Other etiologies for late relapse need to be considered. True secondary ALL, as has been well described in AML, 22‐24 is very uncommon and its existence is, in fact, uncertain 25 . However, a second de novo ALL has been suggested in some cases of relapsed ALL 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because these agents generate a “lesion” that includes DNA strand breaks and proteins covalently bound to DNA, they have been known as topo II poisons. Unfortunately, in certain cases, the use of these agents has resulted in serious drawbacks, including the induction of secondary malignancies [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. On the other hand, the second class of DNA topo II inhibitors only diminished the enzymatic activity of topo II proteins [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%