1983
DOI: 10.1056/nejm198301063080105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapy of Secondary Acute Nonlymphocytic Leukemia with Cytarabine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommendations for therapy have often been intuitive and based on information from select phase II data. 8 Additionally, there remains a reluctance among many practicing physicians to enter such patients on clinical trials. There have been no phase III studies of induction or post-remission therapy of secondary leukemias and no evidence is available to suggest that any regimen is better than standard AML induction therapy consisting of an anthracycline and cytarabine (3 + 7), or similar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendations for therapy have often been intuitive and based on information from select phase II data. 8 Additionally, there remains a reluctance among many practicing physicians to enter such patients on clinical trials. There have been no phase III studies of induction or post-remission therapy of secondary leukemias and no evidence is available to suggest that any regimen is better than standard AML induction therapy consisting of an anthracycline and cytarabine (3 + 7), or similar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 Historically, it was presumed that every patient with therapyrelated leukemia had an adverse prognosis and that standard induction therapy was inappropriate; high-dose cytarabine was suggested in one report. 71 However, there is no evidence that any induction therapy is superior to the standard 3 ϩ 7 regimen. Among young adults, quite remarkably, prospective studies report an almost identical CR rate of 55% to 60% for patients treated with recognized unfavorable cytogenetics, and there are no reports that anything is better than this (Table 2).…”
Section: Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The prognosis of refractory leukemia is poor. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] In an attempt to overcome this feature, salvage therapy tends to be more intensive than standard induction therapy using, when possible, higher dose or other non cross-resistant drugs not previously delivered. These kind of treatments are also used as first-line therapy in other high risk leukemia, such as in the setting of secondary AML (s-AML).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%