2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2007.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapy of Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, those patients with a negative pre-ASCT FDG-PET have an improved 3-year OS rate (91%), compared to patients with a positive pre-ASCT FDG-PET (64%); however, the difference in OS did not reach statistical significance (p=.08). Since cHL patients that relapse after ASCT transiently respond to a number of different salvage approaches, including recent clinical trials with novel agents (5), it is not surprising that the difference in OS is not significant. These outcomes suggest that relapsed cHL patients that receive standard salvage therapy and ASCT and have a negative pre-ASCT FDG-PET enjoy a greater than 75% chance of long term, disease free survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, those patients with a negative pre-ASCT FDG-PET have an improved 3-year OS rate (91%), compared to patients with a positive pre-ASCT FDG-PET (64%); however, the difference in OS did not reach statistical significance (p=.08). Since cHL patients that relapse after ASCT transiently respond to a number of different salvage approaches, including recent clinical trials with novel agents (5), it is not surprising that the difference in OS is not significant. These outcomes suggest that relapsed cHL patients that receive standard salvage therapy and ASCT and have a negative pre-ASCT FDG-PET enjoy a greater than 75% chance of long term, disease free survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these improvements, a substantial number of cHL patients relapse or have primary refractory disease. The currently accepted therapy for relapsed/refractory cHL is standard dose salvage chemotherapy followed by high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in chemosensitive patients, which results in long term disease free survival for 50–60% of patients (25). Pre-ASCT identification of relapsed cHL patients who have a poor prognosis despite ASCT would help direct higher risk patients to investigational therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4]6 More commonly used conditioning regimens in adults and children have achieved event-free survival rates between 40 and 60%. 2,[4][5][6]10,12,15 Although the NRM for those with HL treated with auto-SCT has decreased with time, the use of HDC with or without RT is not without toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] With the exception of certain subgroups who might be cured with chemotherapy and/or RT, the treatment of refractory/relapsed disease often poses more of a challenge, although long-term survival rates have improved to 40-60% over the last 20 years with the use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and auto-SCT. 2,3 Most of the reported data describe an adult rather than a pediatric population, and the few reported pediatric series involve small numbers of patients. 2,[4][5][6] However, several studies suggest that the adult literature describing the use of auto-SCT in relapsed/refractory HL can be extrapolated to children and young adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in another series, positive early PET after two courses of R-CHOP was not predictive, whereas end-of-treatment PET strongly correlated with the outcome. 11 However, so far, outside clinical trials, a modification of treatment based on early PET results is not supported by clinical evidence. IPI remains the best tool to separate DLBCL into different prognostic groups and tailor the treatment accordingly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%