2019
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-125009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapy of Paediatric B-ALL with a Fast Off Rate CD19 CAR Leads to Enhanced Expansion and Prolonged CAR T Cell Persistence in Patients with Low Bone Marrow Tumour Burden, and Is Associated with a Favourable Toxicity Profile

Abstract: Introduction: The CARPALL study (NCT02443831) employed a novel CD19CAR (CAT-41BBz CAR) with a faster off rate than the Kymriah FMC63-41BBz CAR (CAT 3.1x10-3s-1, FMC 6.8 x 10-5s-1), with equivalent on-rate (CAT 2.2 x 105, FMC 2.1 x 105). We herein report updated outcomes and CAR T cell persistence with an additional 6 months follow up from a submitted manuscript (Ghorashian et al., Nat Med, submitted) Methods: Patients aged <25 years with high risk, relapsed C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The KD for a receptor is the ratio between how fast the receptor dissociates from its antigen, koff, and how fast the receptor binds to its antigen, kon. The koff for the FMC63 CD19 CAR is 6.8 x 10 -5 s -1 , whereas the koff for a TCR can vary from as fast as 10 -1 s -1 to as slow as 10 -3 s -1 , which is still over 100 times faster than that of the FMC63 CAR 40,72 . Seminal work showed that the longer a Treg is bound to a target dendritic cell, the more likely the Treg is to kill that cell 52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The KD for a receptor is the ratio between how fast the receptor dissociates from its antigen, koff, and how fast the receptor binds to its antigen, kon. The koff for the FMC63 CD19 CAR is 6.8 x 10 -5 s -1 , whereas the koff for a TCR can vary from as fast as 10 -1 s -1 to as slow as 10 -3 s -1 , which is still over 100 times faster than that of the FMC63 CAR 40,72 . Seminal work showed that the longer a Treg is bound to a target dendritic cell, the more likely the Treg is to kill that cell 52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our first aim was to investigate whether stimulation via a CAR or endogenous TCR/CD28 pathways results in different levels of Treg activation. Given the higher affinity of CARs, including the FMC63 scFv-based CD19 CAR used here 36,40 , compared to TCRs 41,42 , we hypothesized that CAR-mediated activation would lead to a heightened activation state. To assess this, CAR Tregs were coincubated with each K562 cell line, harvested after 48 hours, and their activation status was evaluated by measuring the cell surface expression of CD71 (transferrin receptor), a wellestablished early marker of T-cell activation.…”
Section: Car Tregs Are Functionally Distinct From Tcr/cd28 Activated ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors reasoned that an scFv targeting ALK with favorable binding kinetics for immune synapse stabilization might be one solution to allow signal strength to achieve a threshold for full effector function of ALK CAR T cells against antigen-low neuroblastoma. Recent studies into the relationship of antibody affinity with CAR T-cell function have led to some generalizable findings, such as the observation that fast offrate can lead to short dwell time and potentially diminish T-cell exhaustion [26,27]. However, the precise rules governing the relationship between binding kinetics and quality and quantity of T-cell signal have yet to be elucidated, and the authors therefore followed an empirical approach of screening a panel of CAR T-cell constructs by effector function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite efforts to manipulate donor HSCs to improve transplantation outcomes (Fares et al, 2014;Goncalves et al, 2016;Grey et al, 2020;Holmfeldt et al, 2016), accumulating data show that post-transplant relapse correlates with T cell exhaustion or immune-edited variants lacking major histocompatibility antigen expression (Christopher et al, 2018;Noviello et al, 2019;Toffalori et al, 2019). Immunotherapies have been very promising for malignancies such as melanoma (Leonardi et al, 2020;Luke et al, 2017) and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ghorashian et al, 2019;Maude et al, 2018;Park et al, 2018), but have so far produced disappointing results against AML. Although anti-tumor immune responses have been reported in a variety of AML murine models and in AML patients (Hayashi et al, 2019;Rezvani et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2009;Zhou et al, 2011), paucity of AML-specific antigens, limited in vivo persistence of adoptively transferred T cells, and inability to precisely identify patients likely to benefit have limited immunotherapeutic approaches (Witkowski et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%