2009
DOI: 10.1080/02687030802661762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapy for naming deficits in two variants of primary progressive aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although PPA is a progressive condition, intervention can be helpful in at least temporarily improving production of trained sets of words in both speech [47] and writing [48], which in turn may improve the individual's quality of life, sense of accomplishment and perhaps contribute to their maintenance of language functions over time. Other reasonable goals of treatment might be to reduce the rate of language decline and to provide effective alternative communication strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PPA is a progressive condition, intervention can be helpful in at least temporarily improving production of trained sets of words in both speech [47] and writing [48], which in turn may improve the individual's quality of life, sense of accomplishment and perhaps contribute to their maintenance of language functions over time. Other reasonable goals of treatment might be to reduce the rate of language decline and to provide effective alternative communication strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all previous studies showed that participants improved on therapy items immediately post-treatment, as reviewed by Croot, Nickels, Laurence, and Manning (2009). The available data indicate that (i) relearning is possible, (ii) therapy effects are generally restricted to treated items, and (iii) effects decline substantially over time without ongoing practice (Bier et al, 2009;Frattali, 2004;Graham, Patterson, Pratt, & Hodges, 1999, 2001Heredia, Sage, Lambon Ralph, & Berthier, 2009;Jokel, Rochon, & Leonard, 2002Newhart et al, 2009;Snowden & Neary, 2002). The degree of success of anomia treatment in SD and the ability to maintain relearned words seem to rely on the severity of the semantic deficit Henry, Beeson, & Rapcsak, 2008a, 2008bSnowden & Neary, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Des thé rapies de ré apprentissage sont é galement proposé es à l'aide de tâ ches sé mantiques [120], de dé nomination d'images de caté gories diffé rentes avec indices hié rarchisé s [121], de dé nomination et de maniement sé mantique caté goriel [122], d'exercices de compré hension et de production orale et é crite [123] et de straté gie d'auto-indiç age pour faciliter l'accè s lexical [124]. Ces thé rapies permettent une gé né ralisation à d'autres items non traité s au cours des sé ances et un maintien des acquis allant de 3 semaines, pour les gé né ralisations, à 6 mois pour les items traité s. Un essai avec des tâ ches d'é pellation se ré vè le par contre moins concluant sur la gé né ralisation et le maintien de l'effet [125].…”
Section: Traitementunclassified