Therapeutic Relatedness in Transactional Analysis: The Truth of Love or the Love of Truth

Abstract

Berne was quite critical and skeptical of those forms of therapy that encouraged feeling over thinking, referring to “Greenhouse” games (Berne, 1964/1967, pp. 141–143) in which clients escalate feelings and often idealize feeling over thinking. For the past decade, however, transactional analysis seems to be developing in a different sort of “Greenhouse,” one of enforced warmth, idealized relationships, and attachment/empathy-based clinical strategies. When the authors were originally trained in the 1970s, transactional analysis therapists were supposed to confront people into health. Now it seems they are to attach, attune, and empathize clients into health. Yet Berne's treatment group was not an empathic holding environment; it was an interpersonal study matrix. This article offers a critical review of clinical applications within transactional analysis of theories of attachment, attunement, and empathy. It critiques the clinical models of therapeutic relatedness and presents a clinical model of therapeutic space, which provides client and therapist with the room and opportunity for curiosity, uncertainty, and conflict.

Triumph or Disaster?: A Relational View of Therapeutic Mistakes

“…Yet one of the greatest and most freeing lessons I have learned on my journey is that my failings as a psychotherapist (and, indeed, as a human being) do not necessarily have to lead to therapeutic "disasters" (borrowing from Rudyard Kipling's famous words just quoted). In fact, one of the greatest paradoxes is that those times of failure often provide some of the most creative therapeutic opportunities and personal "triumphs" for my clients, and I find myself agreeing with Cornell and Bonds-White's (2001) comment that "for Bollas, as for Winnicott, empathic failure, rather than inevitably creating or recreating a narcissistic wound, can offer creative space and opportunity" (p. 79).…”

Thinking, Theory, and Experience in the Helping Professions

“…If, in the long run, focused experience gains the upper hand too much, the relationship tends to become more distant. Conversely, if interpersonal experience prevails excessively, there is a risk of developing a fusional dynamic or, as Cornell and Bonds-White (2001) wrote, to put ''the truth of love'' above the ''love of truth'' (p. 71). When the relationship stays sufficiently balanced between professional and interpersonal experience, the place of theoretical concepts in the explicit thinking process of the professional tends to decrease.…”

Quantitative and Qualitative Outcomes of Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy with Male Armed Forces Veterans in the UK presenting with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

“…draw on them in the service of present-centred relating" (p.202). However, the authors were mindful of Cornell and Bonds-White's (2001) critique of the limitations of an over-reliance on the integrative model, with its attendant risk of promoting "a temporary, mutually gratifying narcissistic merger" (p.72) between therapist and client. Consequently, inspired by their support for Bollas ' (1989) stance, which emphasises the need for "a balanced therapeutic process serving the dual functions of soothing and disturbing the client" (p.80), the integrative foundations of the treatment were augmented with a two-person (Stark, 2000) relational focus on the cotransferential (Summers and Tudor, 2000) domain, as pioneered by Hargaden and Sills (2002) and, later, applied to the treatment of trauma and PTSD by Stuthridge (2006Stuthridge ( , 2012 and Caizzi (2012 (Stuthridge, 2006, p.277) and, through an iterative "process of attunement, rupture, and repair" (Stuthridge, 2006, p.277), slowly challenges and rewrites the client's traumatic script (Stuthridge, 2006).…”