1986
DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198610000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic Efficacy of Multiagent Chemotherapy with Drug Delivery Enhancement by Blood-Brain Barrier Modification in Glioblastoma

Abstract: Reversible osmotic blood-brain barrier (BBB) modification was used in 38 patients with glioblastoma to enhance the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents. The patients ranged in age from 14 to 70 years (mean, 43), and all had prior surgery and radiation; 5 had also received systemic chemotherapy. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores ranged from 60 to 100% (mean, 79) on admission to the treatment program. Barrier modification was achieved by intracarotid or intravertebral artery infusion of mannitol, and a ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several methods have been proposed to increase the permeability of the BBB, 6,21,39 pulsed ultrasound is one that has shown significant promise in laboratory studies conducted over the past decade. Using a pulsed ultrasound source in combination with an ultrasound contrast agent (UCA), the application of low-power sonications on brain parenchyma can safely and temporarily open the BBB for durations of 6-8 hours.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several methods have been proposed to increase the permeability of the BBB, 6,21,39 pulsed ultrasound is one that has shown significant promise in laboratory studies conducted over the past decade. Using a pulsed ultrasound source in combination with an ultrasound contrast agent (UCA), the application of low-power sonications on brain parenchyma can safely and temporarily open the BBB for durations of 6-8 hours.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the uptake of higher molecular weight agents, such as monoclonal antibodies, which can be 150,000 daltons, is even further diminished. Preclinical 21,[29][30][31][32][33] and clinical studies 28,34,35 have shown that the BBB function can be reversibly modified to be more permeable leading to a significantly higher uptake of intraarterially delivered drugs compared to the nonaltered BBB 36 . for instance, hypertonic solutions such as mannitol can be used to reversibly increase cerebrovascular permeability 11,28,[37][38][39][40] .…”
Section: Osmotic Blood Brain Barrier Disruption For Enhanced Drug Delmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, rodent animal models have been established within the last decade to fursevere side-effects such as seizures and brain edema 34 . Since individual factors need to be taken into account, an exact formula of the concentration and infusion time is difficult to determine.…”
Section: Selective Intra-arterial Cerebral Infusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BBB also restricts the passage of many drugs from the blood into the brain, for instance chemotherapeutic agents and monoclonal antibodies tried in the treatment of malignant brain tumours (Neuwelt et al, 1980(Neuwelt et al, , 1981(Neuwelt et al, , 1983(Neuwelt et al, , 1986(Neuwelt et al, , 1987.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapoport and coworkers have developed a method for transient opening of the BBB by intracarotid infusion of hyperosmolar solutions such as mannitol and urea (Rapoport, 1970;Rapoport, Bachman & Thompson, 1972a;Rapoport, Hori & Klatzo 1972b;Rapoport & Thompson, 1973;Brightman et al, 1973;Rapoport et al, 1977;Rapoport, Ohata & London, 1981a;Rapoport et al, 1981b). Drug entry and uptake into the brain parenchyma can in this way be increased (cf., Tomiwa, Hazama & Mikawa, 1983;Inoue et al, 1987) and the method has been tried in clinical situations as well, mainly to enhance the uptake of chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of malignant brain tumours (Neuwelt et al, 1980(Neuwelt et al, , 1981(Neuwelt et al, , 1986(Neuwelt et al, , 1987Suda, Nakasu & Saito, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%